- The interviews [of Fernández and Francis] and the interpretations of the interpretations of the interpretations deepen the confusion.
- Sodoma supplicans is a capitulation to the totally false homosex ideology and to wokeism.
- Francis/Fernández cannot explain what the difference is between a "liturgical" and a "private" blessing.
- They obscure the divine teaching with human sophistry.
- Despite the weakness of man, especially in the area of sexuality, Christ did not condone adultery, but said that anyone who even looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery in his heart.
- For Francis/Fernández, those who commit adultery are in "difficult situations" because of their weakness, thus denying the existence of sin as a willingness to do wrong and act against the divine will.
- Such theories are not modern, but a regression to paganism, as can be seen in the old pagan Greek, Roman and Persian world: everyone and everywhere allowed homosexual acts and sexual relations with minors.
Source: https://www.ncregister.com/interview/cardinal-mueller-efforts-to-explain-fiducia-supplicans-add-to-confusion-over-document
Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-SA, #newsTbyqktszko
No comments:
Post a Comment