Bishop Schneider in choir robes
Solemn High Pontifical Mass
… but still no TLM for you!
This was posted recently on the Pope’s Twitter account:
The “plant paradigm” mentioned here is a good symbol, and in fact the preeminent one, for the “organic” nature operative in “handing down” of the tradition of the sacred liturgy, which grew from the seed planted by Christ in His passion, death and resurrection, in His institution of the “Last Supper” and the sacramental nature of his sacrifice as handed on by the apostles in the apostolic tradition, resulting in what we have today in the traditional Latin Mass.
The pope claimed in Traditionis custodes that the two liturgies, old and new, were competing in the Church to the detriment of unity and, thus, the old had to go.
Not a little ironically the tweet also recommends letting various organisms and plants grow together harmoniously within the environment, as Benedict proposed in Summorum Pontificum, decreeing that the new Mass and the traditional Latin Mass should both be permitted to flourish together in the Church for the good of all.
Yes, I agree with the Pope (or his official tweeter): when the flowers of liturgical variety compete, they operate for the overall good of the spiritual “ecosystem” of the Church.
Well, with the banning of the traditional Latin Mass I guess some plants are not good enough to survive the scorched-earth modernism of this papacy, even at the price of grievous self-contradiction. Modernism does not make for good, prejudice-free, equal opportunity gardening.
No TLM for you!
Join us for holy Mass and a continuing series on Saint Thomas and the virtues at the new Sunday traditional Latin Mass location in southern Maryland.
Sundays, 12 noon. Preceded by confessions beginning at 11:30.
One cardinal is speaking out in support of Cardinal Zen after the pope despicably dismissed him as a mere nuisance.
The Grand Master of the Order of the Holy Sepulchre - Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples, who lived in Hong Kong for eight years - has released a testimony in defence of the 90-year-old bishop emeritus whose trial is expected to begin. "China and the Church have in him a devoted son, one not to be ashamed of," he said. "He claims the freedom that every authentic political and civil system should defend".
Rome (AsiaNews) - "Card. Zen should not be condemned. Hong Kong, China and the Church have in him a devoted son, one not to be ashamed of. This is testimony to the truth," writes Card. Fernando Filoni, Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples and today Grand Master of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, in an open letterpublished today from Rome.
The letter arrives at the beginning of the trial of Card. Zen Ze-kiun, the 90-year-old bishop emeritus, who is being tried together with five other pro-democracy figures on charges of failing to properly register a humanitarian fund of which they were trustees. The affair has become a symbol in a city where - as we recalled yesterday - there are more than 1,000 people in prison or on trial for political charges.
Card. Filoni writes: 'When on trial, he who can speak, speaks'. Jesus too did not shy away from this in a trial that would mark the history and life of a man who aroused admiration and deep religious respect: John the Baptist. Jesus too paid for his testimony to the truth: 'What is truth?' Pilate asked him ironically in a dramatic trial in which the Nazarene was accused of violating the sovereignty of Rome and on the verge of being sentenced to death. Another trial is being held these days. In Hong Kong. A city that I loved very much, having lived there for over eight years'.
The reference is to the years when Filoni was sent by the Holy See to Hong Kong in 1992 with the task of opening a Study Mission to closely follow the situation of the Church in China. "There I met Father Joseph Zen Ze-kiun," the cardinal recalls, "He was the Provincial of the Salesians. A Chinese man in everyway. Very intelligent, sharp, with a captivating smile. They used to say to me: 'He's a Shanghai man! Gradually I understood the meaning'. Filoni recalls his contribution to the encounter of cultures, while remaining fully Chinese - 'he never denied his identity'. He likens him in this to two figures such as the great Ming-era intellectual Xu Guangqi and the Jesuit bishop Aloysius Jin Luxian, both from Shanghai.
He then recalls how this was "a city of martyrs at the time of the Nazi-style occupation by the Japanese", of whose violence Card. Zen's own family was a victim, to the point of being forced to flee, losing everything.
"The young Zen," comments Filoni, "never forgot that experience and drew from it consistency of character and lifestyle; and then a great love for freedom and justice. Shanghai was heroic, and his sons were considered heroes, almost untouchable even by the communist regime. Card. Zen is one of the last epigones of those families. Heroes were never to be humiliated; it was also the mentality of the Chinese establishment, as it is in the West for the victims of our own Nazi-fascism'.
Filoni then recalls the years in which the cardinal now on trial taught in seminaries in mainland China, accepting the invitation of Bishop Jin Luxian: "He accepted for the good of the Church, a martyr," he comments, "who rose from his martyrdom and sought the path of survival; this was flexibility, not yielding. He looked ahead and did not enter into judgement towards people: it was his philosophy of life,' he said, 'political systemscan be judged, and his thinking on them was clear, but people cannot; the judgement is deferred to God who knows the hearts of men. His respect and support for the person has always been the cornerstone of his human and priestly vision, and so it remains to this day, even if he is being brought to trial in Hong Kong these days'.
He cites his 'moral and ideal integrity', which prompted John Paul II to appoint him bishop and Benedict XVI cardinal. "Some people consider him to be characteristically a little edgy," Filoni notes. "And who would not be so in the face of injustice and in the face of the demand for freedom that every authentic political and civil system should defend?
"I must testify to two more things," adds the Prefect Emeritus of the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples, "Card. Zen is a 'man of God'; sometimes intemperate, but submissive to the love of Christ, who wanted him to be his priest, deeply in love, like Don Bosco, with youth. This made him a credible teacher. He is 'authentically Chinese'. No one, among those I have known, I can say is as truly 'loyal' as he is".
"Hence - concludes Filoni - this testimony that 'in a trial is fundamental. Card. Zen should not be condemned. Hong Kong, China and the Church have in him a devoted son, one they should not be ashamed of. This is testimony to the truth.”
UPDATE: The Congress has withdrawn the original Declaration and issued a new one since this article was published. Paragraph 10 now reads: “We note that pluralism in terms of differences in skin color, gender, race, language and culture are expressions of the wisdom of God in creation. Religious diversity is permitted by God and, therefore, any coercion to a particular religion and religious doctrine is unacceptable.”
NUR-SULTAN, Kazakhstan (LifeSiteNews) – Pope Francis has joined ecumenical and political leaders in signing a document stating that the “pluralism and differences in religion…are expressions of the wisdom of God’s will in creation.”
The declaration, which can be downloaded here with English text at the end of the document, was the culmination of the 7th Congress of Leaders of World and Traditional Religions held in Kazakhstan.
It was read aloud by the leaders of the Congress on September 15, feast of Our Lady of Sorrows, after which Pope Francis delivered an address echoing the themes and language of the Declaration.
The Declaration, which Pope Francis joined in signing, contains a paragraph stating that God willed the plurality of religions which are present in the world. Paragraph 10 reads: “We note that pluralism and differences in religion, skin color, gender, race and language are expressions of the wisdom of God’s will in creation. Thus any incident of coercion to a particular religion and religious doctrine is unacceptable.” (Emphasis original)
–– Update: The Congress has withdrawn the original Declaration and issued a new one since this article was published. Paragraph 10 now reads: “We note that pluralism in terms of differences in skin color, gender, race, language and culture are expressions of the wisdom of God in creation. Religious diversity is permitted by God and, therefore, any coercion to a particular religion and religious doctrine is unacceptable.”
The Declaration also noted how the Congress participants “stand in solidarity with the efforts of the United Nations and all other international, governmental and regional institutions and organizations, to promote dialogue among civilizations and religions, states and nations.” (Emphasis original)
A recent papal statement seems to open the door to Holy Communion for pro-abortion politicians such as Nancy Pelosi