Robert Lazu Kmita:
« For the “reformists” who wish to definitively bury the Liturgy of the ages, there is no debate. For them, everything is clear, definitive, and irrevocable. Their radical historicism, which tells them that the new liturgy is the result of a necessary evolution, does not allow for alternatives. All their positions, from Pope Paul VI to Pope Francis, testify to this. Confronted with those represented by the Federation Una Voce and traditionalist priestly fraternities, they sometimes display—simultaneously—fury and astonishment. Everything is encapsulated in Ross Douthat’ question (already cited) that describes Pope Francis’s reaction to the traditionalists: "How can this thing still be sticking around?"...
The foundation of this attitude of rejection towards traditionalists and their message is strictly doctrinal: the Second Vatican Council and its reforms are an inevitable necessity. All those who oppose it are doomed to perish, as they resist the course of history and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, which has set entirely different priorities for our times than those of the pre-Council Church: ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, feminism, ecology, global governance, encouragement of immigration, etc.
Because of its irreconcilable demands with such “values,” the Gospel must be modified and attenuated, just like everything that represents traditional Christian identity. The modern world and the man of the revolutions are the landmarks that must be followed without hesitation”
https://x.com/drkwasniewski/status/2012198286447301103?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w
No comments:
Post a Comment