|
|
Please offer prayers for Father Drew, currently in ICU for heart issues and, likely soon, undergoing urgent surgery. He is one of the finest priests and good men I know.
Father is one of the few courageous priests who risk official disfavor by publicly offering the traditional Latin Mass
Oremus.
I still have nightmares from the things I witnessed as an RN during Covid.
I held the hands of elderly patients who didn’t understand why no family was by their side as they died. The sadness and confusion in their eyes was devastating.
I watched moms give birth and not be allowed to have their own mothers by their side as they brought new life into the world.
I saw patients get denied care for curable diseases because they didn’t want an experimental medicine and they were dead six weeks later.
I was there when mothers, fathers, husbands, wives, and children fell to their knees in grief as they screamed when they were denied access to their sick, injured, and dying loved ones.
I witnessed administrators celebrate the control, financial windfall, and power that Covid provided the system.
None of these things happened because of the virus or a pandemic. The tragedies were the willful infliction of distress on a vulnerable population all based on Fauci’s lies and a complicit healthcare system.
By Archbishop Héctor Aguer
The always remembered Pope Benedict XVI — whom it is quite possible will one day be declared a Doctor of the Church — sought, through his Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum of July 7, 2007, on the two uses of the one Roman Rite in its ordinary and extraordinary forms, to liberalize the celebration of the Mass commonly called "traditional," "Tridentine," "of Saint Pius V," or "the Mass of all time." He did so with the aim of contributing to liturgical peace and out of the respect owed to an ancient and venerable usage. In this way, any priest could celebrate the "Latin Mass" without need of special permissions and without risk of ideologically motivated reprisals from certain bishops.
In the letter to the world's bishops that accompanied the Motu Proprio, the Pontiff emphasized that what was sacred for previous generations remains sacred and great for us as well, and cannot suddenly be entirely forbidden or even deemed harmful. God alone knows how much the German Pope suffered when, fourteen years later, on July 16, 2021, his successor in the pontificate revoked that legislation with a stroke of the pen and imposed draconian restrictions on the Vetus Ordo. Something of that suffering has been revealed in recent days by the one who was his faithful personal secretary, Archbishop Georg Gänswein.
Traditionis Custodes, issued five years ago, far from closing wounds, only deepened them. And contrary to what its promoter sought, it contributed to a growing interest in Tradition and Orthodoxy — especially among the young. Today, a good portion of conversions occur among those who prefer the ancient use. And the transmission of the faith, to a significant degree, is no longer passed from parents to children but from young people to young people. I recall here what I have said on so many occasions: I was ordained a priest in 1972 according to the Novus Ordo, and I have never celebrated in the extraordinary form.
The Mystery, without question, continues to captivate hearts. And before a world of liquid relationships, drowning in emptiness and dehumanization — a world that arrogantly claims to live in post-truth, post-humanism, and post-Christianity — Christ, the Way, the Truth, and the Life (Jn 14:6), reasserts all his rights. He shows that through him, facing the Father, in the Holy Spirit, human existence finds its full meaning, in view of the better Future that awaits. The Pauline exhortation to the Colossians thus resonates with renewed vigor: Rooted and built up in him, and established in the faith (Col 2:7). It is a matter, then, of not allowing oneself to be enslaved by the emptiness of a deceptive philosophy inspired by purely human traditions and the elements of the world rather than by Christ (cf. Col 2:8).
It is not, therefore, persecution or the extreme measures of progressivism that will be able to stop this growing movement — which, as we have seen, goes far beyond mere fashion. For the fashion over the past sixty years has been to make of the Novus Ordo — even contrary to what Sacrosanctum Concilium mandated — an anything-goes vehicle of liturgical devastation.
More: https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/07/facing-god-rooted-in-christ-latin-mass.html
The US cardinal questions its theological basis, criticizes controlled ‘synodal’ procedures at the latest consistory, and urges a serious study of its impact on the Church.
VATICAN CITY, 15 July 2026 — Cardinal Raymond Burke has raised serious concerns about the use of “synodality” in a recent consistory of cardinals, warning that the current methodology risks undermining open debate within the Sacred College and obscuring critical issues facing the Church.
Speaking to The College of Cardinals Reporton June 28, following the June 26–27 consistory convened by Pope Leo, Cardinal Burke welcomed the renewed gathering of cardinals, something he noted had not occurred for many years under Pope Francis, and described the opportunity for greater fraternal exchange as a “very great fruit.”
But he also expressed concern that the structure of the meeting limited meaningful discussion as it had adopted a format modeled on “synodal” processes, with cardinals divided into small groups and guided by preset questions.
He argued that this approach prevented in-depth engagement and reduced feedback to consensus-based summaries, potentially excluding dissenting but important viewpoints from reaching the Pope.
“The reports are only reports of what every cardinal agreed upon,” Cardinal Burke said, adding that perspectives not shared by a majority may be omitted despite their significance.
He described a final session conducted in the traditional open-debate format as the most productive part of the gathering, although limited by time. The free discussion, in the presence of the Pope, was how past consistories of cardinals were undertaken.
Overall, he said the consistory was a “very controlled” process, including the apparent pre-selection of discussion leaders and limited opportunities for free intervention. In his view, this risked diminishing the role of cardinals as advisors to the Pope.
Turning to the growing use of “synodality” in the Church, Cardinal Burke firmly questioned its theological and historical grounding, describing it as a concept without clear definition or precedent in Church tradition. While synods have long existed as occasional consultative gatherings, he emphasized that they are not constitutive elements of the Church’s nature.
“There is no definition of synodality, there’s no history of it in the Church,” he said, expressing concern at the merging of established structures, such as consistories, with what he regards as an undefined concept.
Citing St. Paul’s teaching on the transmission of the faith — “I hand on to you what I first received” — Burke argued that continuity is essential and absent from current formulations of synodality.
“So we have to insist that this whole synodality business stop, and there be a very serious study done of the whole matter, because we’re talking about the very life of the Church, and we’re talking about the salvation of souls,” he said.
The cardinal also cautioned against reshaping established ecclesial structures around what he characterized as a contemporary and insufficiently examined idea. “The Church does not have paradigm shifts,” he said, rejecting language used in synodal and other discussions that suggested a radical change in direction for the Church’s teaching or mission.
The cardinal also warned that an excessive focus on contemporary concerns risks conforming the Church to secular ways of thinking, rather than addressing the modern world from within her own doctrinal and historical continuity.
“I’m confident our Lord will protect the Church,” he said, “but we have to do our part to say, ‘No, this concept of synodality, while it may have a good motive in the sense of wanting to address the faith of the contemporary time, is fundamentally flawed.”
More: https://x.com/edwardpentin/status/2077489570065899776?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w
FLASH INFO** — A crucifix remained standing after the violent fires that ravaged Gironde and Landes.
