Sunday, May 31, 2026

Dominica Sanctissimae Trinitatis: The Mercy Hidden in the Mystery No Man Can Master

Trinity Sunday teaches the Catholic soul to adore before it explains, to suffer without panic, and to live every ordinary duty in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

After Pentecost, the Church Makes Us Look Up

The Church does something very wise on the Sunday after Pentecost. Having shown us the fire of the Holy Ghost descending upon the Apostles, she immediately raises our eyes to the eternal source from which all grace comes: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, one God in three divine Persons.

Dom Guéranger’s Liturgical Year explains the fittingness of this placement. After Pentecost, the Apostles go forth to teach all nations and baptize in the Name of the Holy Trinity; therefore the feast honoring “One God in Three Persons” rightly follows Pentecost. He adds that all liturgical homage has the Holy Trinity as its object, since the Trinity is “the foundation of all others, and the source of all grace.”

That is why the Introit does not begin with speculation, argument, or apology. It begins with blessing.

“Blessed be the Holy Trinity and undivided Unity: we will give glory to Him, because He has shown His mercy to us.”

There is the whole feast in one sentence. The greatest mystery of the Christian religion is approached through gratitude. We bless the Trinity because God has shown mercy to us.

A child learning the Sign of the Cross may understand less theology than a professor, yet he may be nearer the heart of the feast. His little hand rises to the forehead, descends to the breast, moves from shoulder to shoulder, and the whole body is marked with the Name into which he was baptized. Before he can explain the Trinity, he belongs to the Trinity.

That is the Catholic order. First worship, then understanding. First the knee bends, then the mind is enlightened.

The Mystery That Humbles Without Crushing

The Collect asks God that, “in the confession of the true faith,” we may acknowledge the glory of the eternal Trinity and adore Unity in the power of divine Majesty. Then it asks for protection: “that in the firmness of this faith we may ever be protected from all harm.”

That phrase is worth lingering over. The Church does not treat the doctrine of the Trinity as an abstract puzzle for the clever. She treats it as armor.

The Roman Catechism teaches that in one divine nature there are three Persons: the Father unbegotten, the Son begotten of the Father before all ages, and the Holy Ghost proceeding from the Father and the Son from eternity. It warns that curious inquiry into this mystery is dangerous when detached from reverence, and urges the faithful to adore “distinction in the Persons, unity in the essence, and equality in the Trinity.”

The old Baltimore Catechism says the same thing with the clarity of a school bell: the Blessed Trinity is “one and the same God in three divine Persons,” really distinct from one another, perfectly equal, and one because they possess one and the same divine nature. It also reminds us that this is a supernatural mystery, a truth we cannot fully understand but firmly believe because God has revealed it.

Modern man wants a God small enough to manage. The Catholic wants the living God, even if he must fall silent before Him.

Picture a man sitting in a hospital corridor at two in the morning. His wife is behind a closed door. His phone is dead. The vending machine light flickers. He has already prayed every prayer he knows, then prayed them badly, then prayed without words. At that hour, he does not need a god who can be reduced to a slogan. He needs the God from whom, through whom, and unto whom are all things.

He needs the Father who made him, the Son who redeemed him, and the Holy Ghost who can still breathe charity into a heart terrified by suffering.

The Trinity is not an escape from life’s pain. It is the truth that makes pain bearable, because above every confusion stands eternal Wisdom, eternal Love, eternal Life.

“Oh, the Depth”

The Epistle from Romans is one of those moments when St. Paul seems to reach the edge of human speech and stop. “Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and of the knowledge of God! How incomprehensible are His judgments and how unsearchable His ways!”

Haydock’s commentary notes that after speaking of grace, predestination, mercy, and justice, St. Paul breaks into this exclamation to teach submission of judgment before the secrets of Providence. No man first gives to God so that God becomes his debtor; all things are from Him, governed by Him, and directed to His glory.

This is where many souls lose peace. They can accept the Trinity in the catechism, yet resist the Trinity in Providence. They profess that God is infinite wisdom, then become frantic when His wisdom does not explain itself on their schedule.

A mother once taught her little girl embroidery. From underneath the cloth she saw only knots, crossed threads, and ugly tangles. From above, the mother saw the pattern. One day, when she complained that the underside looked like a mess, the mother turned the hoop over and showed her the flower.

That story may be simple, but St. Paul gives the adult version. We are living beneath the embroidery of Providence. We see the underside: delayed answers, humiliations, illnesses, disappointments, family griefs, betrayals, unanswered questions, and the sins we thought we had conquered rising again like weeds after rain.

God sees the pattern.

Faith does not require us to pretend the underside is beautiful. Faith teaches us that the underside is not the whole cloth.

“Oh, the depth.”

The soul that can say those words in darkness has already begun to adore.

The Mercy of Being Small

The modern world flatters man by telling him he is autonomous. The Trinity saves him by revealing that he is dependent.

“For from Him and through Him and unto Him are all things.”

From Him: every breath, every hour, every child, every loaf of bread, every absolution, every grace.

Through Him: every good action, every act of patience, every confession made after shame, every temptation resisted, every prayer whispered with no sweetness.

Unto Him: every duty, every suffering, every hidden sacrifice, every Mass, every deathbed, every grave, every resurrection.

A young lawyer works late, exhausted and irritated. He has spent the day fighting petty office politics, answering emails, and wondering whether any of it matters. On the train home, he sees an old woman make the Sign of the Cross before eating a sandwich wrapped in foil. No drama, no audience, no spiritual performance. Just gratitude.

In that small gesture is more wisdom than in a thousand self help manifestos. She knows the sandwich comes from God. She knows her life is moving toward God. She knows she eats, breathes, suffers, and hopes under the sign of the Trinity.

That is the Catholic life. It is not lived only in choirs, monasteries, and feast day processions. It is lived in kitchens, hospital rooms, traffic, courtrooms, offices, nurseries, and lonely apartments where someone still says, “Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost.”

The Name Into Which We Were Claimed

The Gospel gives the great Trinitarian commission.

“All power in heaven and on earth has been given to Me. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”

The Catena Aurea, gathering the Fathers on this passage, records St. Jerome’s point that naming the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost is naming one God, since their Godhead is one. It also gives St. John Chrysostom’s consoling gloss on Christ’s promise to remain with His own: the Lord tells His disciples not to fear the difficulty of their mission, because He is with them and can make all things easy.

Haydock makes the same Catholic point: in baptism we are made Christians in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, professing faith, hope, service, and adoration toward the same three divine Persons; Christ’s promise to be with His Church “all days” extends to the successors of the Apostles until the consummation of the world.

There is something almost terrifying in the tenderness of that. We were not baptized into an idea. We were not baptized into a religious mood. We were baptized into the Name.

A name means possession. A soldier wears the insignia of his country. A bride receives a name as a sign of covenant. A child bears the family name before he understands the duties and inheritance attached to it.

The Christian bears the Name of the Trinity.

That means your ordinary life is not ordinary in the way the world thinks. Your body was washed in that Name. Your soul was claimed in that Name. Your forehead has been signed again and again in that Name. Your sins are absolved in that Name. Your coffin will be blessed in that Name.

The question is whether your life gives glory to that Name.

Teaching Them to Observe

Christ does not say merely, “Teach them interesting doctrines.” He says, “Teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”

There is the forgotten half of Catholic formation. Doctrine must become obedience. Adoration must become life. The Trinity must move from the catechism page into the conscience.

A man can defend the filioque online and still be cruel to his wife. A woman can know the Athanasian Creed and still nurse envy. A teenager can serve the old Mass beautifully and still live a double life on his phone. A father can demand reverence in church while bringing none of it home.

The Gospel will not allow that division. Baptize them. Teach them. Then teach them to observe.

The Trinity leaves fingerprints on the moral life. The Father teaches us gratitude and obedience. The Son teaches us sacrifice and truth. The Holy Ghost teaches us charity and purity of heart.

So the feast asks practical questions.

Does my home reflect order, or only appetite?

Does my speech give glory to God, or does it spread irritation, gossip, and contempt?

Do I make the Sign of the Cross like a Catholic, or like a man swatting a fly?

Do I invoke the Trinity in prayer, then live as if my time, money, body, and opinions belong only to myself?

The faith protects us from harm when we live inside it. A castle protects the man who enters it, not the man who admires it from the road.

The Trinity and the Family

Every human analogy limps before the Trinity, and the Church rightly warns us not to reduce divine mystery to creaturely images. Still, the Christian home can reflect something of God’s order by grace.

The Father is not solitary power. The Son is not rebellion. The Holy Ghost is not sentiment. In God there is eternal relation, eternal knowledge, eternal love, without confusion and without division.

A Catholic family learns from this. Authority should be fruitful, not selfish. Obedience should be noble, not servile. Love should be sacrificial, not indulgent.

Imagine a father coming home after a brutal day. He wants silence. He wants a drink. He wants everyone to leave him alone. His youngest child runs to him with a broken toy and an urgent request that, in adult terms, means nothing. The father almost snaps. Then, by grace, he remembers: from Him, through Him, unto Him.

So he kneels down.

The toy is repaired badly. The child is delighted. The father’s evening is interrupted, yet his soul is more ordered than it was ten minutes earlier.

That little conquest matters. The Trinity is glorified when a father acts like a father under God, when a mother loves with patient strength, when children obey with trust, when forgiveness is asked before bedtime, when the home becomes a small school of charity rather than a hotel for competing egos.

The greatest dogma in the Faith reaches all the way down to the tone of voice used at the dinner table.

The Trinity and Suffering

The Gradual blesses God “Who look into the depths from Your throne upon the Cherubim.”

That line should comfort anyone who feels unseen. God looks into the depths.

He looks into the depth of the grieving heart.

He looks into the depth of the conscience ashamed of repeated sin.

He looks into the depth of a marriage under strain.

He looks into the depth of an old man’s loneliness.

He looks into the depth of the convert who wonders why grace has made life harder rather than easier.

The Trinity is not far away because He is high. His height makes His nearness possible. A god who is merely part of the world can only stand beside one suffering creature at a time. The living God, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, is nearer to the soul than the soul is to itself.

A woman kneels in the back pew after Mass. She has not received because she needs confession. She feels unworthy even to remain in the church. The sanctuary lamp burns quietly. Nothing dramatic happens. No vision. No voice. Yet she says, “Blessed be the Holy Trinity and undivided Unity, because He has shown His mercy to us.”

That prayer is already a door opening.

The Father is calling her home. The Son has already shed the Blood that can cleanse her. The Holy Ghost is moving her to repentance.

The Trinity is not a doctrine for the sinless. The Introit says mercy.

The Mass as Trinitarian Worship

The Secret asks God to hallow the sacrificial offering and “through it to make us an eternal offering” to Him.

This is one of the most beautiful petitions in the Mass. The offering on the altar is Christ. Yet the Church asks that we, too, be made an offering. The baptized soul must become what the Mass teaches it to be: something handed over to God.

Guéranger later observes that the Holy Eucharist is the best means by which we give worship to the three divine Persons, and that it is also the bond uniting earth with heaven.

That is the secret of Catholic worship. We do not climb to the Trinity by our own eloquence. We are carried by the Sacrifice of the Son to the Father in the unity of the Holy Ghost.

This is why careless worship wounds the Catholic instinct so deeply. At Mass, we are not holding a meeting, staging a lesson, or expressing a community mood. We are being drawn into the supreme act of adoration. The Son offers Himself to the Father. The Holy Ghost sanctifies. The Church, gathered into Christ’s sacrifice, gives glory to the undivided Trinity.

The most important thing happening in the world on Trinity Sunday may be hidden under the appearance of bread and wine.

Before All Living, We Will Praise Him

The Communion antiphon says: “We bless the God of heaven, and before all living we will praise Him; because He has shown His mercy to us.”

Before all living.

That means the faith is public. A Catholic should not flaunt piety like a costume, but neither should he hide gratitude like contraband.

Make the Sign of the Cross before meals in public.

Say grace when company is present.

Bless your children without embarrassment.

Keep holy water by the door.

Let your home contain visible signs that God is worshipped there.

Speak the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost with reverence.

A man who cannot bless himself in a restaurant will struggle to confess Christ before persecutors. Courage usually begins in small acts. Cowardice does too.

The old Catholic world understood this better than we do. Bells rang. Processions moved through streets. Farmers blessed fields. Mothers taught children to cross themselves before sleep. Men removed hats before churches. Time itself was punctuated by the Angelus, the liturgical year, the saints, the fasts, the feasts, the Mass.

Trinity Sunday gathers all of that into one act of praise.

Blessed be the Holy Trinity and undivided Unity.

Firmness of Faith

The Postcommunion asks that the reception of the sacrament and the profession of faith in the eternal Holy Trinity and undivided Unity may benefit us “for the salvation of body and soul.”

Body and soul. The whole man must be saved.

The doctrine of the Trinity guards the mind from error, but it also heals the person. It teaches the proud intellect to kneel. It teaches the anxious heart to trust. It teaches the lonely soul that ultimate reality is not isolation but eternal life, knowledge, and love. It teaches the sinner that mercy is not an afterthought in God.

The Father did not begin loving when we began existing. The Son did not become lovable when He became man. The Holy Ghost did not begin proceeding when He descended at Pentecost.

Before creation, before Bethlehem, before Calvary, before the tomb, before the font where you were baptized, God was eternally blessed in Himself.

And yet this same God has shown mercy to us.

That is the wonder.

The infinite Trinity has bent down to claim dust.

The God whose judgments are incomprehensible and whose ways are unsearchable has given us His Name.

The God whom no mind can master has made Himself the refuge of children.

So on Trinity Sunday, the Catholic soul does not try to solve God. It adores Him. It believes Him. It blesses Him. It receives from Him, lives through Him, and returns unto Him.

Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost.

As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end.

Amen.

Subscribe: https://bigmodernism.substack.com/subscribe?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=email-subscribe&r=2x82t4&next=https%3A%2F%2Fbigmodernism.substack.com%2Fp%2Fthe-mercy-hidden-in-the-mystery-no&utm_medium=email


Saturday, May 30, 2026

Cardinal Eijk on Courting and Signs of Affection




“For boys and girls who are courting or engaged to be married, it is of course permissible to show affection for each other through hugging and kissing. The form it takes and the extent to which it is permissible depends on the circumstances and culture in which they live. These displays of affection are also necessary because it is difficult to marry someone with whom one has not established an emotional bond. Of course, it is possible for this to involve sexual arousal. In this case, there is a ‘necessary occasion for sin,’ because—as already mentioned—preparation for marriage requires both prospective marriage partners to form an affective bond with each other. They should try to avoid losing self-control in doing so by not meeting too often and for too long alone. In addition, they should frequently resort to prayer, receive the Eucharist, and, if necessary, the sacrament of penance and reconciliation. In the latter sacrament, before receiving absolution, they must make sincere efforts to the best of their ability to avoid losing self-control. However, they cannot be asked to avoid this risk altogether. It is obviously different for people who do not have the will to avoid this risk. They cannot be absolved. By the way, the confessor should realize that the guidelines given by classical moral theologians for this purpose must be applied with the necessary nuances in our time, because avoiding the opportunity to be sexually aroused has become very difficult. Think of the arousing images in advertising, on television and the internet, in reading material, and even in teaching aids.”

(The Bond Of Love, Ch. 11, n. 11)

Friday, May 29, 2026

Polish Priests and Laity Reject Bishops’ Statement on Relations with Judaism

Radical Fideiity

May 3, 2026



“Yet another controversy has shaken the Synodal Church, this time in Poland, again exposing the deep divide between the postconciliar Synodal hierarchy and many priests and faithful who still want to follow the perennial teaching of the Church.

The incident also, when viewed in the context of a recent report that we will get to at the end of this article, again highlighted the ridiculousness of the Synodal Church’s false ecumenism.

The Polish bishops’ conference issued a pastoral letter in March to mark the 40th anniversary of John Paul II’s “historic” (read: treasonous) 1986 visit to the Great Synagogue of Rome. That visit, often cited as a milestone in modern Catholic-Jewish relations, was used as the occasion for a strong condemnation of antisemitism and an invitation for Catholics to visit synagogues and meet with local Jewish communities.

The letter repeated two statements that immediately provoked widespread backlash.

First, it declared: “Israel remains the chosen people,” citing the apostate heretic Francis and Evangelii Gaudium.


“Second, it stated: “That the Jews share in God’s salvation is theologically beyond question, but how this can be possible without an explicit confession of Christ is and remains a profound mystery of God,” quoting the Vatican Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews on the 50th anniversary of the highly heretical and blasphemous Nostra Aetate.

Reports quickly spread that a large number of priests simply refused to read the letter at Mass. Some estimates claimed that the overwhelming majority of clergy ignored it, though exact numbers were never officially verified. Some priests defended themselves by saying the bishops had not formally mandated its public reading, but the refusal itself revealed something much deeper: many clergy did not want to place these claims before their people.


Professor Dariusz Oko of the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow became one of the strongest public critics. Writing in Do Rzeczy, he said Catholics felt “hurt and humiliated” and even “betrayed by their own shepherds.” He argued that the bishops had effectively wounded the faithful by repeating ideas many Catholics believe undermine the uniqueness of Christ and the necessity of the Gospel.

“He was far from alone.”

More: https://x.com/radical_fidelit/status/2050856073578357192?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Father Rupert Mayer, the “Apostle of Munich”

In 1937, Rupert Mayer stood in his pulpit at St. Michael's Church in Munich and preached against Hitler.

By then, Germany had been a Nazi dictatorship for four years. Most priests remained silent. Most bishops tried to negotiate with the regime. Most Germans cheered. Mayer preached the opposite.

He was 61 years old—a Jesuit priest in a black cassock, standing on a wooden prosthetic leg. He had lost his original leg 21 years earlier. Here is how he got there.

Rupert Mayer was born in Stuttgart on January 23, 1876, the son of a prosperous merchant. He wanted to be a Jesuit from his teens, but at his father’s request, he became a diocesan priest first. He was ordained in 1899 at age 23, and a year later, he finally entered the Jesuit novitiate.

By 1912, he had settled in Munich, the city he would serve for the rest of his life. After World War I, Munich was a broken place—full of jobless veterans, hungry families, and people drifting in from the countryside with no housing or hope. Mayer went to work. He collected food and clothing, found jobs, and walked the streets at night to visit the poor. He walked, then hobbled, then walked again on that wooden leg.

He had lost his leg during the Great War. Having volunteered as a military chaplain, he served in field hospitals and the trenches across France, Poland, and Romania. On December 30, 1916, a grenade exploded near him, destroying his left leg. He was awarded the Iron Cross, First Class—the first priest to receive one of Germany’s highest military honors.

Back in Munich, he never stopped. By 1921, he was preaching at St. Michael's and celebrating Mass at the train station at 3:10 AM so workers could attend before their early shifts. The city began calling him "the Apostle of Munich."

Then came 1933. Adolf Hitler became Chancellor, and the Nazi Party began closing Catholic schools and trying to replace Christian identity with Nazi ideology. While much of the clergy stayed quiet to protect what they had, Mayer went straight to the pulpit. He preached against the Nazis by name, stating that a Catholic could not be a National Socialist and that Hitler’s racial theories contradicted the Gospel.

The Gestapo began sending informants to his sermons. In 1937, they ordered him to stop speaking in public altogether. He obeyed the letter of the law by avoiding rallies, but he returned to his pulpit and preached harder than ever.

He was arrested on June 5, 1937. At his trial, he told the judge: "Despite the ban imposed on me, I shall preach further, even if the state deems it a punishable act." He was given a suspended sentence, but he didn't stop. He was arrested a second time in 1938, then a third time in 1939. This time, the Gestapo tried to force him to break the seal of confession to reveal the names of Nazi opponents. Mayer refused.

At age 63, the one-legged priest was sent to the Sachsenhausen concentration camp and placed in solitary confinement. His health collapsed quickly. Fearing that his death in the camp would create a martyr, the Nazis moved him to Ettal Abbey under house arrest in 1940. For five years, he was forbidden to preach, leave, or receive visitors. He waited and prayed while his country destroyed itself.

On May 11, 1945, American soldiers liberated the Abbey. A U.S. officer personally drove Mayer back to the ruins of Munich. He climbed back into his damaged pulpit at St. Michael's and told the congregation: "Even a one-legged Jesuit, if it is God's will, can live longer than a 'thousand-year' dictatorship."

He spent his final months preaching reconciliation and forgiveness, refusing to call for revenge. On November 1, 1945, while preaching during Mass on All Saints' Day, he suffered a stroke and collapsed. He died within minutes, still in his vestments, still in his pulpit.

Mayer’s story matters because when most chose survival over witness, he chose the truth. He could have stayed quiet, but as he told a Gestapo interrogator, ....


"I cannot be silent. I am a priest."

In 1987, Pope John Paul II beatified Rupert Mayer in Munich. Today, while streets and schools in Bavaria bear his name, much of the world has forgotten him. He was the Iron Cross priest who fed the poor, refused to break the seal of confession, and outlasted a dictatorship. His legacy remains: a wooden leg that stood firm against the Reich.

SOURCE: Buzzing America on Facebook

Wednesday, May 27, 2026

“OnlyFans is a mortal sin”

“OnlyFans is a mortal sin, for producer and consumer alike. As Governor, I'll institute a 50% sin tax on it, not out of contempt, but out of love for those trapped in its vicious cycle, those who sell themselves and those who buy. OnlyFans, specifically, and porn, generally, destroys relationships, careers, and friendships on both sides of the screen. We can call out sin all we want. But if we do nothing to stop it, we don't really mean it.”

James Fishback @j_fish running for Florida governer

Also:

“Meanwhile, the Church:

"The only major US Church body that has expressly referenced OnlyFans by name is the US Catholic bishops (USCCB), who did so in order to condemn it."

@honestpollster, Mark Mitchell, of the Rasmussen report

Leo XIV: Between the social encyclical and the change of an era

Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical – a social encyclical – should have clarified whether a transition between the old and the new world truly took place. The impression, arising from several clues, is not only that the transition is yet incomplete, but that it has yet to begin.

What do we know so far from Magnifica HumanitasLeo XIV’s first encyclical?

We know that the first social encyclical in history, written by another Leo, Leo XIII, was signed on May 15, the anniversary of Rerum novarum.

We know that this encyclical has as its subtitle “On the Safeguarding of the Human Person in the Age of Artificial Intelligence.”

We know it is to be presented by Cardinal Michael Czerny, who appears to have played a very significant role in the encyclical, and by Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, as well as by Christopher Olah, one of the co-founders of AI giant Anthropic.

We know this is a social encyclical.

Then we have the leaks, the unofficial information, which helps us understand how the encyclical will be structured. We know that the Italian edition will be long: 231 pages in volume, divided into five chapters and a conclusion, and covering 245 points.

And then we have expectations, fueled by rumors. It’s a social encyclical that takes a broad view of the entire theme of social doctrine, retraces it, seeks to trace continuity with history, and identifies a discontinuity within it. And this discontinuity was born precisely from the explosion of artificial intelligence.

The Holy See has never demonized technology, and it won’t do so now. But it has always maintained clear principles of social doctrine, from subsidiarity to solidarity, which certainly must be part of a world in which private companies are becoming more important than states, and personal profit risks being detrimental to the common good. That, too, is a crucial tenet of the Church’s social doctrine.

It’s easy to expect the encyclical to contain these specific references. It’s also easy to imagine that the theme of multilateralism, or the shared responsibility of states to contribute to the common good, will also be present. The Holy See has been pursuing, for years, a reform of the United Nations that is truly representative of all nations. Leo XIV, and with him the Holy See, has addressed the crisis of multilateralism in several speeches. Really, all the social teachings of the popes bear witness to this.

If these are likely to be the themes of the encyclical, one wonders how it is destined to have a real impact or contribute something new.

On the one hand, it is fair to note that popes should not introduce novelties at all but rather ensure continuity. True, but the continuity should create space for an innovative contribution, a new thought that, among other things, Leo XIV called for during his trip to Africa and that Cardinal Pietro Parolin evoked in celebrating the 325th anniversary of the Pontifical Ecclesiastical Academy, the school of the pope’s ambassadors.

It is here, however, that we see how the transition from the old to the new world has not yet begun.

The encyclical is presented by two of the cardinals who most closely represent Pope Francis’s thinking, albeit in different ways. Czerny brought to the Vatican a particular sensitivity to migrants, combined with a love of popular movements and a closeness to the most politically progressive voices.  A Jesuit, naturally curious about the secular world, Czerny was Pope Francis’s right-hand man in managing a dicastery that had traditionally been, above all, intellectually vibrant, like the old Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.

Fernandez was Francis’s man, the first promoted by the pope and the last great friend to arrive in the Curia, even presented with an autographed letter from Pope Francis that highlighted what he was expected to do as “Guardian of the Faith.”

Leo XIV, in short, has relied on the Old Guard, and that could indicate either the persistent lack of a true generational change in the Vatican, or that Leo has yet to look to the future and therefore must rely on the past.

The risk is that an encyclical that should be a generational transition is actually still rooted not in the history of the Church, but in a particular pontificate.

And yes, I dare hope that the encyclical also touches on the issues of digital identity studied by Justice and Peace in the mid-1990s, or that it goes back in time to consider two documents on the 1986 global economic crisis from the same pontifical council. And again, I’d like to hope that it will be noted that in 1986, the UN declaration on the right to development called for the defense of integral human development, thus betraying the presence of a Catholic negotiator (from the Holy See? Who knows…) who had been quite successful.

The big problem, however, is that this historical perspective has been largely missing from Francis’s pontificate and risks being absent even in the first encyclical of this pontificate. It is a particularly long encyclical, and everything suggests it will be composed of countless quotations, attempting to provide continuity

Much will be interesting, but nothing will be new.

Thus, the first major act of Leo XIV’s pontificate risks being merely a declaration of intent, demonstrating, however, that Leo XIV is a pope of a new generation but still somewhat in the shadow of the old. This is an interesting fact, considering that, in his recently published Augustinian writings, Leo XIV’s thought appears in line with the history of the Church, but also personal, and in its own way innovative in its approach.

The big question is whether this encyclical will mark the end of an era or the continuation of one.

But there is a positive aspect. Since it is a very long text, everyone can read it and take from it what they see fit. Obviously, there will be manipulation on both sides. But it will also offer the opportunity to delve deeper into the Church’s thinking. Leo XIV obviously approves of the text and will even present it personally.

But one wonders whether this is a compromise text or the text Leo XIV really had in mind when he began the project.

We may be waiting for something further in the future to mark a real generational shift in thinking.



Thank you for visiting.

Followers

Kamsahamnida, Dziekuje, Terima kasih, Doh je, Grazie, Tesekur, Gracias, Dank u, Shukran

free counters