This is an erroneous interpretation of Scripture. But before all that we must say, and repeat often, that life is not a "religious" issue. The right to life is a "fundamental principle of justice".
God is just, and commands that all laws uphold the just treatment and recognize the rights of every human person. But when we speak as Catholics and believers in the public square we do not always and in every case ask our interlocutors to accept our creed in order to agree with us. We ask only that our society, our government and our laws uphold the fundamental principles of justice as inscribed in the founding documents of our Republic and in the hearts of every human being, of every creed, color and language. This means that EVERY human being must be respected and loved, throughout the whole course of their lives.
No one may ever, under any circumstances, be deliberately killed. This is not a purely religious idea. This concept is accessible to any human person simply through the use of reason. In the case of capital punishment and war this can sometimes tragically be the case. But in abortion and embryonic stem cell research, in every crime against the unborn child and the child in the course of being born, it is always and in every case an abominable crime. Always. There is a very great evil involved in the monstrous act of slaughtering a completely defenseless human being - the image and likeness of God in our midst.
And, now, to "Render unto Caesar" - how fraught with danger is our own interpretation of the Scriptures! When Christ taught "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and unto God what is God's" he was in fact authorizing the very protest and disobedience against unjust laws that Catholics, other Christians and men and women of good will are protesting in the March for Life each year in Washington and in other places all over this country.
Let's hear what the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say:
"The citizen is obliged in conscience not to follow the directives of civil authorities when they are contrary to the demands of the moral order, to the fundamental rights of persons or the teachings of the Gospel. Refusing obedience to civil authorities, when their demands are contrary to those of an upright conscience, finds its justification in the distinction between serving God and serving the political community. 'Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.' 'We must obey God rather than men':
- "When citizens are under the oppression of a public authority which oversteps its competence, they should still not refuse to give or to do what is objectively demanded of them by the common good; but it is legitimate for them to defend their own rights and those of their fellow citizens against the abuse of this authority within the limits of the natural law and the Law of the Gospel."
- (CCC 2242)
Praised be Jesus Christ!