Monday, March 23, 2026

Is your child being groomed online?

(N.B. Nothing replaces the relationship with the family and rely he parents. Nothing. And certainly not a stranger online.)

I set fire to my school when I was thirteen years old.

They sent me to an institution. I was there for about a month. A man in that facility did something to me that I have never spoken about publicly until today. I was a child. He was not.

I carried that for thirty-one years. Through a marriage. Through five kids. Through driving a garbage truck at 5 AM and writing between stops in parking lots with the engine running. Through 1,800 posts and 26,000 subscribers, and a ministry I built with my bare hands.

Thirty-one years of silence.

I'm breaking it now.

Not because I want your sympathy. Not because I want to "process" or "heal" or whatever word the therapists use. I'm breaking it because I watched a 22-year-old kid on the Shawn Ryan Show this week describe being groomed on Roblox at twelve years old, by a developer that Roblox put in their own commercials, and I sat in my chair, and I could not move.

Not because of what happened to him.

Because I looked at a picture of my own children on the wall across the room.

And I thought about every screen in my house. Every app I never opened. Every conversation I never asked about. Every night, my kids were in their rooms on devices I paid for, connected to platforms I never checked, talking to people I never met.

And I realized something that made me sick.

I've been so busy carrying my own silence that I almost missed what was happening right in front of me.

Let me tell you what's happening.

Right now — tonight — there are grown men on Roblox, Discord, VR Chat, and a dozen other platforms your children use every single day. They have playbooks. Not metaphorical playbooks. Literal, documented grooming strategies. They build trust with your kid over weeks. They gift virtual currency. They isolate. They normalize. And then they destroy.

The kid on the Shawn Ryan Show tried to kill himself at fifteen. His mother reported it to Roblox. The company did nothing. The predator — a man named Kevin Nolan, featured in Roblox's own TV commercials on Cartoon Network — is still free. Still online.

Seven hundred thousand people watched that interview in two days.

Twenty million reports of child exploitation hit the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's CyberTipline last year. Twenty million. Reports of online enticement surged 192% in a single year. And those are just the cases someone actually reported.

Your child's bedroom is not safe. Not because you failed as a parent. Because the battlefield moved into your house through a screen, and nobody told you.

I know what it feels like when a man reaches for a child in a room no one is watching. I know what it does to a boy. I know what it costs him for the next three decades. I know the silence. I know the shame. I know the way your body flinches at things you can't explain, and your wife asks what's wrong, and you say "nothing" because you don't have the words.

I have the words now.

And I'm using them.

I'm not starting a movement. I'm not launching a nonprofit. I'm not pivoting my platform. I'm doing what a father does. A father protects his own. And he warns other fathers.

So here's your warning.

Check your kids' phones tonight. Not tomorrow. Tonight. Open Roblox. Open Discord. Look at the friend lists. Read the messages. Ask your child who they're talking to. And when they say "just my friends" — verify it. Because the man who hurt me was supposed to be helping me. And the man who groomed that kid on Roblox was supposed to be making games for children.

The people who destroy children don't look like monsters. They look like helpers. They look like developers. They look like youth pastors, coaches, and family friends. And they are counting on you being too busy, too trusting, or too distracted to notice.

Don't be.

Be not ye afraid of them: remember the Lord, which is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and your houses. — Nehemiah 4:14

That was written for men standing on a wall with a sword in one hand and a trowel in the other. Building something and defending it at the same time.

That's us.

I wrote the full story on Substack today. Everything I've never said. What happened to me. What I found. What I'm going to do about it. And what I need from you.

If you're a father, read it. If you're a mother, read it. If you have a child with a screen in their hand, read it.

And if you know someone who needs to see this — share it. Not for me. For the kid in the room, no one is watching.

I'm done being silent.

We're not hiding anymore.

@Biblicalman on Twitter/X.

Sitting down to confession

 



Many years ago, when I was studying in Rome, I heard the story of an Italian bishop who made a difficult decision to deny priestly ordination to a candidate. The reason was that during the more than eight years the young man spent in the seminary, he never received the sacrament of Confession. The bishop had a compelling reason for denying Holy Orders: a priest who lacked appreciation for experiencing God's mercy would not be able to offer it to his parishioners.

The bishop knew that this candidate for the priesthood, having never gone to confession, would have a very fragile and inconsistent vocation. Without the experience of being forgiven during his years of formation at the seminary, once ordained, he could easily become accustomed to a double life, which would also lead to eventual scandal for the faithful of his parish. A priest's commitment to confessing his own sins often strengthens his own vocation as a minister of the Lord.

We priests must have profound respect, love, and reverence for the sacrament of forgiveness. Sometimes the faithful say things like: "Father, I'm going to tell you a secret I've never told anyone in my life"; "I've kept a sin hidden for over fifty years, one I haven't dared to confess, and now I'm going to tell you"; "I can't bear what I did anymore, and I feel like it's burning my soul." The experience of knowing the innermost depths of another person's heart should make the priest, like Moses before the burning bush that was not consumed, remove his sandals: what he treads on is holy ground.

I must confess that, as a priest, I haven't always been fully available to hear confessions. I used to think they should be heard exclusively in the sacred space of the church, which is ideal. I remember once, many years ago, a distressed young man stopped me in the street wanting to go to confession. I made the mistake of telling him the confession times and that he had to adhere to them. Later, I repented of my error. Today, I am open to hearing the confession of any member of the faithful, whether it's in the street, at an airport, or in a store, and whenever they ask. Throughout one's priestly life, one matures and comes to appreciate the wonders of this sacrament.
  
As a penitent, I've had pleasant experiences and, on occasion, not so pleasant ones. The warmth with which the priest receives you in the confessional is fundamental. I will never forget some confessions that, quite literally, marked my life thanks to the exquisite kindness of the minister of God and his prudence in judging my sins. Above all, I have greatly appreciated the priest's ability to advise, to lift spirits, and to transmit hope. On other occasions—fewer, admittedly—rigidity, coldness, or some unnecessary questions made me feel a little uncomfortable.
  
Some penitents arrive at the confessional with a certain anxiety about confessing their sins. Some don't approach for fear of harsh judgment. Others say they are very nervous. Faced with all these possible emotions, it is extremely comforting to find a confessor who is serene, calm, and even greets people with a smile and good-humored words; a confessor who reflects profound inner peace and who will never raise his eyebrows or exclaim "My God!" at the sins he hears, but remains always unperturbed, as if reflecting the heart of that merciful Father who knows the clay from which we are made.
  
The most important thing about sitting down to hear confessions is to keep in mind that penitents who come to you expect an encounter with God's infinite mercy. They wait for the Lord, who does not treat us according to our sins nor repay us according to our wickedness (Psalm 103), to reveal himself to them and lift them from their misery. Personally, I like to sit down to hear confessions with Sacred Scripture in hand and try to illuminate the consciences of the faithful with the light of the divine Word, either to show, through a passage, the abundance of God's love in his encounter with the sinner, or to help the penitent overcome their sin.
  
Priests can do a great deal of harm to penitents when we scold them. We all go to the confessional vulnerable, and a hurtful word or an outburst from the confessor can cause a person to never return to the sacrament. But we can also cause serious harm when, in our desire to overprotect, we fail to uncover the truth of the sin. Helping someone recognize their sin is not about reproaching or scolding them, but about showing them with serene realism the wrong they have committed so that they may receive divine forgiveness and avoid eternal damnation. Therefore, a good rule for the confessor is "not to reproach, not to overprotect," but to encourage the faithful, showing them the immense love God has for them, so that they can make small changes and improvements in their lives.
  
May God grant us priests that we may never tire of hearing confessions and that we may offer generous times for the faithful to receive the sacrament. Leading people to an encounter with Christ and bringing them into contact with divine forgiveness is the very reason for our priestly existence.

Sunday, March 22, 2026

Michelangelo bust rediscovered in Rome after centuries in obscurity

 

Art historians confirm sculpture is the work of the Renaissance master.

Experts have formally attributed a marble bust of Christ the Saviour in a Rome church to Michelangelo Buonarroti, in a revelation of global significance for the art world.

The announcement on Wednesday follows extensive historical research and technical analysis that has lifted the veil on the true provenance of the sculpture in the Basilica of Sant’Agnese fuori le Mura.

The findings, the result of a decade of archival research into wills, diaries and inventories dating back to 1564, challenge the long-held belief that the artist destroyed his final sketches and sculptures.

The report, presented by independent researcher Valentina Salerno, suggests that rather than destroying his portfolio, Michelangelo took measures to safeguard his works, entrusting them to a loyal inner circle.

The marble work had remained in the Roman basilica on Via Nomentana for centuries, largely overlooked or regarded as a high-quality copy.

However scholars, led by Salerno, have now identified the piece as a mature work by Michelangelo, linking it to his late devotional style and noting its profound anatomical precision and emotional depth.

The attribution is bolstered by a significant discovery: a Michelangelo drawing sold at Christie’s London last month possesses a provenance that aligns perfectly with the Rome bust.


Saturday, March 21, 2026

We already have an “altered Mass”: it’s called the novus ordo

The addiction to constant change is a feature and not a bug of the Vatican II mentality, legitimized however subversively by reference to a certain “spirit” operating as a hermeneutic with loose reference to the documents of said council.

The Church is in need not of change, whether or not for its own sake. The Church has need of stability.

The Abbot of Solesmes proposes changing the traditional Mass to effect its insertion into the missal with the Mass of Vatican II unchanged. This is an oxymoron: the Vatican II liturgy is defined most precisely by its constant state of evolution, never being any one thing but under a constant process of permutation.

The only reality left in the public life of the Church which is not subject to the evolution of revolution is the holy Mass of tradition. It is defined most perfectly as that which does not change.

With due regard for the venerable scholarship of the good abbot, the most simple and unlearned of souls can perceive the value of the traditional liturgy as flowing from its perennial history as something precious which is handed down, organic and not manufactured.

Leave the holy Mass of tradition alone. It is nearly the only Catholic treasure we have left in this confused and rootless age of disbelief and sacrilege.

- a simple priest




The Priesthood is “too hard”? Marriage is hard, also.


The problem is the naïveté and immaturity with regard to life itself, with commitment of any kind necessary for all vocations.

There is no way of life possible without vocation and without the "no" to all the choices that re incompatible with the vocational choice. Chastity is hard for everyone. That’s why it’s a virtue. Celibacy is an excuse. Hopefully one day, for his own good, he will be able to be ashamed.

Ever hear of something called the "golden parachute"? I think the choice of his next vocation was made before he decided to quit his current one. Not sure what her name is...

Alberto Ravagnani, 32, the former priest, photographed in his hometown of Milan for The Telegraph - Laura Larmo

I quit the priesthood because it’s too hard to stay celibate

Years of inner conflict over his sexuality have pushed Alberto Ravagnani to challenge one of Catholicism’s most divisive disciplines

https://x.com/telegraph/status/2028062830595854573?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Friday, March 20, 2026

Bishops Abandon Teaching Role to Peddle Sentiment

 “The USCCB’s brief abandoned faithful American Catholics to their personal consciences on the issue, while demanding a fundamentally anti-Catholic approach: love divorced from the truth.”

Jacqueline O’Hara argues that the US bishops’ intervention in Trump v Barbara substitutes moral sentiment for moral clarity, reducing a complex question of immigration, citizenship and the common good to an emotive appeal that fails to reflect the full breadth of Catholic teaching.

America’s bishops and the birthright blind spot

Jacqueline O'Hara

American Catholics deserve moral clarity regarding the ongoing immigration crisis. Unfortunately, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ amicus brief in Trump v Barbara this week failed to give them that.

The brief categorised ending birthright citizenship as an immoral attack on human dignity and so reduced a complicated moral and political issue to an incoherent emotional appeal. It also excluded or misinterpreted key Catholic teachings regarding the obligations of citizens, national leaders and immigrants. It was not even written by a Catholic.

This half-hearted attempt at virtue-signalling...

More: https://thecatholicherald.com/article/americas-bishops-and-the-birthright-blind-spot

Thursday, March 19, 2026

Catholic Brothers and College Students Create New AI Platform in Honor of St. Carlo Acutis

 Saint Carlo Acutis "is perhaps the best example of how to use technology to serve God."

The Signs of the Times: The St. Jerome Project and the Renewal of Catholic Education


When a group of parishioners at St. Jerome Parish in Hyattsville, MD, set out to save their school from closure, they had no idea they would be helping to launch a nationwide renewal of Catholic education. What accounts for this unlikely story?

On the fifteenth anniversary of the St. Jerome Educational Plan, join us to hear co-author Michael Hanby reflect on the meaning of this moment in the history of the Church, the reasons for this unlikely success, and the need for the systematic reform of Catholic education in America.

The lecture will take place on Tuesday, March 24, at 7:00 p.m., in Keane Auditorium, McGivney Hall.

An R.S.V.P. is requested; click here to register.

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

The recasting of the conclave

From Damian Thompson @holysmoke:

“These ‘secrets of the conclave’ were never very secret and are being spun by former Team Francis hacks like Lamb. Conservatives were less interested in electing Erdo than stopping Parolin, hence their votes shifting quickly to Prevost. Francis didn’t have a chosen successor but certainly would have preferred Prevost to a Secretary of State who exploited the Pope’s illness so shamelessly. That said, Francis’s fawning media allies now find themselves excluded from the inner circle. They pretend nothing has changed but everyone knows they’re sulking.”

Ref this:


How Pope Leo was elected: New details of dramatic conclave battle revealed


https://x.com/holysmoke/status/2028354754238169293?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

In full: unpublished letter reveals Benedict XVI’s final reflections on prayer and the future of faith

 Niwa Limbu

9 MIN READ
SHARE

An unpublished letter by Pope Benedict XVI, written little more than a year before his death, has been released in a new Italian book, offering an insight into the late pontiff’s theology and view of the future of the Faith at the end of his life.

The text appears in La fede del futuro, the fourth instalment in a collection of previously unpublished and hard-to-find writings by Joseph Ratzinger, issued by the Siena-based publishing house Edizioni Cantagalli. The series is introduced by a preface from the Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin.

Cardinal Parolin writes that “the theme of the future is increasingly becoming the subject of theological reflection on faith, because it is by no means certain that humanity will continue to believe in God”. He notes that Ratzinger’s concerns in the essay are not limited to the fate of faith alone, but also embrace “the uncertainty and confusion prevailing in the world, which are causes of the loss of hope and of widespread fear”. The question of what lies ahead, he observes, is not confined to believers but touches all humanity.

Referring to the unprecedented acceleration of historical development in recent years, the cardinal says that humanity has been confronted with “extreme possibilities but also with extreme dangers”. The future, he says, “is no longer awaited with hope but with apprehension; it has even become a nightmare for many”. Against this backdrop he asks if “faith still has a role to play in shaping the world of tomorrow? Will the Church continue to exist?”

The unpublished letter by Benedict, dated Vatican City, 27 April 2021, is titled “Introduction: Thoughts on Christian Prayer” and sets out a concise yet theologically dense meditation on the nature of prayer as the fundamental religious act. Written in the final period of his life, the text returns to themes that characterised his theological work over decades, including Christ as mediator, the centrality of the Eucharist and the purification of human desire.

Pope Benedict XVI begins by defining prayer in general terms as “the fundamental religious act” and “the attempt to enter concretely into contact with God”. He immediately distinguishes Christian prayer from other forms by stating that it is conducted “together with Jesus Christ and, at the same time, prays to Him”. Christ, he writes, is both man and God and therefore “can thus be the bridge, the pontifex, who makes it possible to overcome the infinite abyss between God and man”.

In this sense, he continues, Christ is “the ontological possibility of prayer” and also its “practical guide”. Benedict recalls the Gospel scene in which the disciples, having seen Jesus at prayer, ask: “Lord, teach us to pray” (Lk 11:1). He notes that they were aware that even John the Baptist had instructed his followers in prayer, but that Jesus was “infinitely closer to God than even the greatest religious figure: John the Baptist”. From this he draws out what he calls the two fundamental characteristics of prayer, that which relates to being and that which relates to awareness, intertwined in a profound bond with God that consists in abiding with Him.

Turning to what he describes as mistaken or insufficient forms of prayer, Benedict recalls the prophetic words of Samuel: “To obey is better than sacrifice, to heed is better than the fat of rams” (1 Sam 15:22). He writes that the juxtaposition with the Cross is evident throughout Christ’s proclamation and that Christian prayer, united to Jesus, is inseparable from His self-offering.

He states that Christian prayer, insofar as it is prayer together with Christ, “is always anchored in the Eucharist, leads to it, and takes place within it”. The Eucharist, he writes, is “prayer fulfilled with one’s whole being” and represents the “critical synthesis of cult and true worship”. In it, Jesus has pronounced His definitive “no” to mere words and to animal sacrifices, placing in their stead “the great ‘yes’ of His life and death”.

For this reason, Benedict describes the Eucharist as both “the definitive critique of cult” and “the cult in the broadest sense of the term”. He notes that the Fathers of the Church characterised it on the one hand as the end of pagan custom and on the other as that which defines Christianity itself as prayer. He adds: “I believe we ought to reflect much more deeply on this fundamental opposition.”

The letter proceeds to emphasise the realism of Jesus’s teaching on prayer. Citing the parable of the friend who refuses to rise from his bed to give bread, Benedict writes that prayer is “always also an overcoming of our inertia, which inspires so many excuses for not rising”. To pray, he says, “means to push against this inertia of the heart” and involves the humility of bringing even “the small things of our daily life” before God and asking for His help.

In a concluding reflection, he addresses what he calls objections to petitionary prayer, namely the view that true prayer should consist solely of praise rather than repeated requests. Such a position, he writes, would be foolish if it assumes that God should not be troubled with human needs. On the contrary, “we need God precisely in order to be able to live our everyday life starting from Him and oriented toward Him”.

He points to the structure of the Lord’s Prayer, which consists of seven petitions, as evidence that asking is intrinsic to Christian prayer. “Asking God also and above all means purifying our desires so that we can place them before God and so that they may be inserted into the ‘we’ of the family of Christ,” he writes.

The publication of the letter in La fede del futuro offers a final glimpse into the spiritual mind of Pope Benedict XVI in the closing phase of his life, when, in retirement and physical frailty, he remained intellectually precise. The full letter is reproduced below with kind permission of Edizioni Cantagalli: 

INTRODUCTION THOUGHTS ON CHRISTIAN PRAYER

by Benedict XVI

In general terms, prayer is the fundamental religious act: it is, in some way, the attempt to enter concretely into contact with God. The peculiarity of Christian prayer lies in the fact that one prays together with Jesus Christ and, at the same time, prays to Him. Jesus is at once man and God and can thus be the bridge, the pontifex, who makes it possible to overcome the infinite abyss between God and man.

In this sense, Christ is also, generally speaking, the ontological possibility of prayer. For this reason, He is also the practical guide to prayer. That is why His disciples, who had seen Him pray, addressed this request to Him: “Lord, teach us to pray” (Lk 11:1). They recalled that John the Baptist had taught his disciples to pray, knowing well that He is infinitely closer to God than even the greatest religious figure: John the Baptist. 

Thus emerge the two fundamental characteristics of prayer: that relative to being and that relative to awareness. They are intertwined with one another. The profound bond with God, in general terms, consists in abiding with Him. In Jesus’ school of prayer, our knowledge of Him grows, as does our closeness to Him. In this regard, we must also keep in mind Jesus’ criticism of mistaken or insufficient ways of praying.

The juxtaposition with the Cross, evident throughout His proclamation and even in the prophetic words that had marked the tenor of prophecy up to Jesus—“To obey is better than sacrifice, to heed is better than the fat of rams” (1 Sam 15:22)—is already clear. Moreover, Christian prayer, insofar as it is prayer together with Jesus Christ, is always anchored in the Eucharist, leads to it, and takes place within it.

The Eucharist is prayer fulfilled with one’s whole being. It is the critical synthesis of cult and true worship. In it, Jesus has said His definitive “no” to mere words and His “no” to animal sacrifices, and He has placed in their stead the great “yes” of His life and death.

Thus the Eucharist represents the definitive critique of cult and, at the same time, the cult in the broadest sense of the term. The Fathers of the Church rightly characterized it on the one hand as the end of paganism, as consuetudo [custom], and on the other as characterizing Christianity itself as prayer. I believe we ought to reflect much more deeply on this fundamental opposition.

This fundamental orientation of Jesus’ dramatic history of prayer enables us to understand the whole realism with which He went about His proclamation. The parable of the man who did not want to get up to give bread to his friend clearly says that prayer is always also an overcoming of our inertia, which inspires so many excuses for not rising. To pray means to push against this inertia of the heart and therefore also means the humility of bringing before God even the small things of our daily life, asking for His help.

One final point.

Often, the realistic and humble way of praying is presented as an objection to petitionary prayer as such: that adequate prayer should always and only be praise of God, not continual begging. This would already be foolish, since God could not and should not be bothered with our small things. In our daily life, however, we must think of ourselves. Yet in reality we need God precisely in order to be able to live our everyday life starting from Him and oriented toward Him. Precisely in not forgetting that our Father is the one in whom we trust, the Lord’s Prayer consists of seven petitions.

Asking God also and above all means purifying our desires so that we can place them before God and so that they may be inserted into the “we” of the family of Christ.


Will the Holy Sepulchre remain closed for the feast of the Lord’s Resurrection?

 


@paracleto4 on Twitter/X:

THE HOLY SEPULCHRE IS CLOSED.  

THE SITE OF CHRIST'S RESURRECTION. CLOSED!  

From February 28, 2026.  

Never happened in 2000 years of history.  

Not during the Crusades.  

Not during the world wars.  

Not during the pandemic.  

Today it is closed.  

Holy Week is approaching.  

Golgotha is inaccessible.  

The Empty Tomb is barricaded.  

Father Ibrahim Faltas, Custodian of the Holy Land, implores the Israeli authorities to reopen it at least for Holy Week.  

Now tell me: whoever closes the holiest place in Christendom during Lent—is he a friend to Christians?  

I've been saying it for decades and they ridiculed me.  

Answer.  

The doors are closed. And the world is silent.  

More: https://x.com/paracleto4/status/2033549878756852029?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

The Lenten fast of St. Patrick atop Ireland’s holy mountain

 It is worth recalling Patrick’s own intense devotion to the Lenten fast and the fruit it bore for the conversion of the Irish, so we might embrace something of his spirit.

Left: Pilgrims on Croagh Patrick in County Mayo, Ireland. (Image: Alan James / Wikipedia); right: Icon of Saint Patrick from Christ the Savior Russian Orthodox Church, Wayne, WV. (Image: Wikipedia)

As Catholics, we celebrate the saints for their heroic witness to our Christian Faith. Each saint has a day on the Church calendar, which typically falls on the date of death, known as their dies natalis, “heavenly birthday.” These are days for merriment, meant for taking a break from the austerities typical to the Christian life, which is why they are known as “feasts.”

St. Patrick’s Day has an outsized influence in popular culture because of the large Irish diaspora spread across the globe. As the saying goes: “Everyone’s Irish on St. Patrick’s Day.” Celebrations in honor of Ireland’s patron saint are characterized by great festivity with parades, the playing of bagpipes, traditional dance, the wearing of green, and time in the pub.

There is a problem, however. This feast on March 17th always falls during the fast of Lent.

While breaking the fast for a saint’s feast is certainly in keeping with Catholic culture and even piety, it is important for the revelers enjoying the celebrations of the “Apostle of Ireland” to return to the fast at day’s end. The best way to honor the saints is by imitating their virtues.

It is worth recalling, then, Patrick’s own intense devotion to the Lenten fast and the fruit it bore for the conversion of the Irish, so we might embrace something of his spirit.

To best do this, we follow in the footsteps of the one hundred thousand pilgrims a year who make their way to Ireland’s holy mountain, known as Cruach Phádraig, “Croagh Patrick.” It was there that Ireland’s patron spent the forty days of Lent in the year 441, praying and fasting on its summit.

The anglicized word “croagh” refers to a hill or mountain that is shaped like a cone or stack. The Irish refer affectionately to the mountain as the “Reek” which comes from the old English word hrēac, meaning a “haystack” or “pile.”

More: https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2026/03/17/the-lenten-fast-of-st-patrick-atop-irelands-holy-mountain/


Thank you for visiting.

Followers

Kamsahamnida, Dziekuje, Terima kasih, Doh je, Grazie, Tesekur, Gracias, Dank u, Shukran

free counters