For the second time …

AdVaticanum
"hoc facite in meam commemorationem." Lucas 22:19
For the second time …

AdVaticanum
N.B. The malicious words and works of Diotroephes are seen today in calumniators who, in attacking others by name within the community, commit mortal sin.
3 John 1:5-10
5 Dearly beloved, thou dost faithfully whatever thou dost for the brethren, and that for strangers,
|
Is ecumenical respect a one-way street? There was a great deal of respect at the meeting between Pope Paul 6th and Archbishop Michael Ramsey in March 1966 marked a moment of proximity on the trajectory of the possible return of schismatic Anglicanism to the mother Church that may never have been closer.
Anglicanism had experienced a deep wave of nostalgia for the sacrament of the Mass which gave birth to the Anglo Catholic movement. Rome had begin the process of negotiation with the spirit of the age that was to move it closer to the novelties of the Reformation Churches in the Second Vatican Council.
Nearly sixty years later, the trajectory of Anglicanism has been torn out of orbit and moved not only beyond the reconciling reach of the most hospitable of ecumenical gestures from Rome, but in the judgement of many, beyond the boundaries of orthodox Christianity itself.
Sarah Mullally is not only the first woman to be ‘produced’ by the appointments system of the Anglican establishment, but she represents a rebuke to orthodox Christianity not only in her person, but also in her convictions.
She is the expression of a Church that has drunk deep from the rage of contempt and antipathy that is an aspect of feminism, and carries a full range of progressive views which she imposes on the tradition of the Church like a rebuke.
The right to kill children in the womb is one of those views. The right to promote sterility in adult romantic relations is another.
If she represents the full impetus of secular feminism in its assault on deeply embedded Christian belief and culture which the Catholic Church represents, the Catholic Church should temper the respect it owes to the head of a Protestant denomination with a degree of caution and wariness.
In fact, there was no caution or wariness in Pope Leo’s greeting of the feminist pro-abortion Anglican woman archbishop.
Should there have been? Should niceness and diplomatic politeness have been modified by fidelity to those values Sarah Mullally repudiated?
Many Catholics left the faith or joined the Protestant Church as the latter showed gains in several regions

People worship at the Satchmo Summerfest Jazz Mass, honoring New Orleans jazz legend Louis Armstrong, in historic St. Augustine Catholic Church on Aug. 3, 2025. (Photo: AFP)
A new analysis from Pew Research Center has found that Catholicism has lost more members than it has gained in most of the 24 countries surveyed, while Protestantism has seen net gains in several nations, especially Latin America.
The shifts are due to religious switching, or leaving one's childhood religious identity for another in adulthood.
Pew published its findings April 23, based on data from its surveys of 24 countries spanning Asia and the Pacific, Europe, Latin America, North America and sub-Saharan Africa.
The center's 2023-2024 Religious Landscape Study provided the data for the U.S., while international data was drawn from surveys conducted during the spring of 2024.
Pew noted the latter data included additional countries not referenced in the April 23 analysis, since the overall percentages of Christians in those nations was too small (1% or less) to statistically differentiate between Protestants and Catholics.
Those who leave Catholicism "tend to join Protestantism or disaffiliate from religion altogether," said Pew, noting that "disaffiliation is especially common in parts of Europe and Latin America."
In contrast, those who leave Protestantism "tend to become religiously unaffiliated," said Pew, which defines "religious nones" as atheist, agnostic or "nothing in particular."
Even with the losses sustained, Catholicism remains the majority religion in eight of the 24 nations studied, with Poland, the Philippines and Italy topping the list.
Pew noted that 96% of the Polish population was raised Catholic, with 92% still identifying as such in adulthood. The Philippines, where 88% are raised Catholic, has also seen a high adult retention rate, with 78% of that nation's adults still regarding themselves as Catholic. In Hungary, 57% of adults identify as Catholic, with 59% of the population having been raised Catholic.
Italy has experienced higher losses, with 89% of the nation's adults raised Catholic, and 67% of them identifying as such.
In Mexico, 66% of adults regard themselves as Catholic, although 87% of the nation's population is raised in the faith. In Peru, where 81% are raised Catholic, 63% of adults still identify with the faith.
Spain sees 80% of its population raised Catholic, but just 45% identify as such in adulthood, while in France, with 60% raised Catholic, only 34% of adults describe themselves as such.
In the U.S., less than one third (30%) are raised Catholic, and only 17% of adults describe themselves as Catholic. Those figures are slightly higher in Canada, where 39% are raised Catholic and 20% of adults identify as such.
More: https://www.ucanews.com/news/catholicism-loses-members-in-most-countries-surveyed-pew/113001
Lesson from the first letter of St. John the Apostle
1 John 4:1-6According to German mystic Anne Catherine Emmerich, the ‘after-church’ will not be a counter-church or a schismatic church, but the Catholic Church itself because it is increasingly distancing itself from Christ.

After an initial meeting in January, this new consistory confirms the intention to establish these assemblies as a regular organ of governance. But beyond the rhythm, it is above all the doctrinal line that draws attention. From the first initiatives of the new pope, one observation stands out. Far from a doctrinal rebalancing or a return to the traditional foundations of the faith, the work undertaken in Rome seems to confirm a line already widely drawn.
At the heart of the reflections proposed to the cardinals once again stands the programmatic text of Pope Francis's pontificate: *Evangelii gaudium*. This text is presented by Leo XIV as a "decisive point of reference" that remains, in his view, under-exploited. The Roman Pontiff wishes the cardinals to evaluate what has been implemented and what remains "misunderstood."
Yet, as Abbot Davide Pagliarani emphasized in a recent interview, this orientation rests on a profoundly new conception of evangelization. This consists in reducing the proclamation of the faith to what its promoters call the "kerygma," that is, to an extremely simplified formulation of the Christian message, centered on a few essential affirmations.
Such a method, appealing in its apparent simplicity, in reality relegates to the background the entire doctrinal and moral content transmitted by the Church's Tradition. What, for centuries, constituted the richness and precision of the Catholic faith thus finds itself regarded as secondary, or even as an obstacle to proclamation.
The notion of "kerygma" forms the central axis of this orientation. It involves expressing the faith in a few brief, accessible, and immediately "attractive" formulas, intended to spark a personal experience.
But this approach poses a major difficulty: it tends to dissociate the encounter with Christ from the objective truths of the faith that are nevertheless its foundation. Faith is no longer primarily adherence to a revealed content, transmitted and clarified by the magisterium over the centuries; it becomes a subjective experience, detached from the dogmatic formulations that guarantee its authenticity.
Such a perspective inevitably leads to a doctrinal impoverishment. As the Superior General of the FSSPX has pointed out, this method has already produced, under the previous pontificate, a genuine doctrinal void felt in many sectors of the Church.
In this perspective, three main dossiers must be addressed during the consistory.
The reform of the catechism is presented as a priority in the face of the erosion of faith transmission. If the stated intention may seem legitimate, one question remains: will this reform truly restore the integral teaching of the Church's doctrine and morality, or will it fit into the logic of the "kerygma," at the risk of proposing a simplified and incomplete version?
Ecclesiastical communication constitutes a second axis. In a world saturated with information, the Holy See wishes to make its message "more audible." But here again, the difficulty lies not so much in the form as in the content: effective communication cannot compensate for a doctrinal weakening.
The promotion of bishops' pastoral visits, finally, is presented as a means of fostering a "missionary boldness," while avoiding an approach deemed too administrative. However, this orientation fits into a broader vision where pastoral action tends to take precedence over doctrinal clarity.
These various initiatives take place within a more general framework: that of synodal reform. This is presented as the body responsible for discerning, according to contexts, what must be preserved or modified in the Church's teaching and practice.
In practice, this amounts to substituting evolving decisions for the constant responses of Tradition, dependent on consultative processes whose criteria remain vague. Recent experience has shown that this mode of operation can lead to gravely problematic orientations on the doctrinal and moral levels. The danger is twofold: on the one hand, a weakening of the content of the faith; on the other, a growing instability in its expression and application.
The reduction of the Christian proclamation to a minimal core presents an obvious advantage in an ecumenical perspective. By limiting itself to very general affirmations—the love of God, salvation in Jesus Christ—it becomes easier to find common ground with the Orthodox and Protestants.
But this apparent unity comes at the price of integral truth. For what precisely makes the specificity of the Catholic faith—its precise doctrinal content, its theological coherence, its demanding morality—tends to disappear from the discourse. The result is a form of unity without depth, based not on the fullness of truth, but on a reduction of it to its most minimal expression.
The consistory announced for June 2026 thus appears as an additional step in a process already well underway: that of a progressive transformation of the very conception of the Church, of its magisterium, and of its mission.
Behind the themes of "mission" and "communication" looms in reality a profound mutation: a Church where doctrine tends to fade before experience, where Tradition is relegated to the background, and where magisterial authority dissolves into evolving processes.
Faced with these developments, it appears more necessary than ever to recall that the Church's true mission cannot be conceived without the integral transmission of the faith, as it was received from the apostles and faithfully preserved over the centuries. For diminishing the truth does not make it more accessible, but without integral transmission, it truly leads souls to Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Translation courtesy of @FSSPXFR on Twitter/X
https://x.com/fsspxfr/status/2046509571628314769?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w
Editor’s note: This article was originally published on September 19, 2024. LifeSite has decided to republish it for the one-year anniversary of Pope Francis’ death, which occurred on April 21, 2025. We continue to pray for his soul and for his successor, Leo XIV.
The following essay is the first in a two-part series on the prophecies of Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich, the ‘synodal church,’ and Pope Francis. Part two can be found HERE.
(LifeSiteNews) — Two hundred years ago, the German mystic Anne Catherine Emmerich died in Dülmen, Westphalia. The stigmatized nun saw not only the life of Jesus in her visions, but also the future of the Church. Shortly before her death, she said: “There will be an after-church.”
During Emmerich’s time, such a thing was hardly imaginable, and what would an “after-church” be on top of that? I admit: I wondered about that as well, at least until with Pope Francis the “synodal church” emerged and, with it, a rapid decline.
But one thing at a time: What do Francis, the “synodal church,” and Blessed Anne Catherine have to do with each other?
The key lies in an amendment made by Emmerich, in which she spoke of a “dark church.” By this, she meant a church in which the light of Christ is extinguished. Accordingly, the “after-church” will not be a counter-church or a schismatic church, nor a Protestant “church” like the “church” of the Anglicans or Lutherans. Instead, the Catholic Church itself will be this “post-church” because it is increasingly distancing itself from Christ.
This is where Francis comes into play, who has openly contradicted his predecessors and – at least in part – even Christ Himself. Cardinal George Pell has, therefore, rightly called Francis’ pontificate a “disaster,” one could also say: a pontificate that does not correspond to the will of Christ.
More: https://x.com/shiningsweu/status/2046882570969776401?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w