Monday, August 24, 2026

Why are women defending Lindsay Clancy after she killed her three children?

Why are so many women so angry? They won. They got everything they wanted. Men have never been doing this badly, and women have never been doing this well. They make more, they have the majority of jobs, they are the majority of college graduates … they make more money, have much lower rates of suicide, addiction, and alcoholism, and live longer … they took over all men-only spaces, they took over the Boy Scouts, they ended men’s bathrooms, they can fly fighter planes and be in combat.” 

- Peachy Keenan 

TikTok videos of women sobbing and holding their babies with the phrase 'Same, Lindsay' have gone viral, with the implication that many mothers may perpetrate similar horrors.

Featured Image
 Shutterstock

Fri Aug 21, 2026 - 4:58 pm EDT

(LifeSiteNews) — On January 24, 2023, 32-year-old Lindsay Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse, sent her husband Patrick to pick up takeout food and go to the pharmacy. Then, she strangled her three young children – 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan – with rubber exercise bands, slashed her own wrists and neck, and threw herself out of a second-story window. Patrick returned to find two of his children dead in the basement and his wife bleeding outside. Callan died in the hospital three days later.

Lindsay Clancy was charged with the first-degree murders of her three children, and her trial began last month in Plymouth, Massachusetts. Clancy is now divorced, paralyzed from the waist down due to her suicide attempt – and the subject of an outpouring of support that feels vaguely reminiscent of the cult following surrounding Charles Manson.

Her supporters have donated nearly a million dollars to her via GoFundMe; gathered outside the courthouse; and posted viral videos and social media posts insisting that Clancy, too, is a victim – of the pharmaceutical industry, of a society that callously ignores female struggles, of a medical system that trivializes female mental health.

Nobody denies that Clancy killed her children. The prosecution states that she “acted intentionally, rationally and swiftly” rather than in a moment of postpartum psychosis; she very deliberately planned the murders by researching them ahead of time and ensured her husband was out of the house. The defense insists that the killings were triggered by a lethal combination of psychiatric medications and her postpartum struggles.

Scores of TikTok videos of women sobbing and holding their babies with the phrase “Same, Lindsay” have gone viral; the disturbing implication that many mothers are on the verge of perpetrating similar horrors provoked equally viral responses. These, predictably, range from boorish minimization of postpartum depression to genuine and justified outrage that women are willing to invoke the name of a child-killer in videos featuring their own babies.

Other viral videos feature women shrieking and breaking things to vent their postpartum pain or melting down in other ways. The videos, of course, were very carefully filmed, edited, and posted, negating the idea that they feature uncontrollable psychosis or raw glimpses of involuntary moments. In fact, the critiques of the videos are almost identical to the prosecution’s case against Clancy herself: Both the moments in the videos and the murders (allegedly) are meticulously premediated rather than spontaneous and involuntary. The resulting “debate” has been a vicious doom loop.

These videos might as well be custom-made to serve as fodder in the culture war of attrition between the sexes. Those posting them are demanding from viewers recognition of their pain, affirmation of their experience, understanding of how difficult postpartum depression is. But the very act of creating this content appears to affirm the most misogynist possible responses to the reality of postpartum depression by cynically presenting crisis porn as spectacle and inviting the world to watch.

As Samuel D. James wrote in one of the best columns analyzing the “debate” that is currently roiling the digital world, the internet is making men and women hate each other.

Deeply immoral AI destruction of books

After seeing a post on it yesterday, I’ve looked more deeply into Anthropic’s purchasing and destruction of millions of used books. 

They spent tens of millions of dollars acquiring and destroying books to train their AI model, Claude.

They knew, from the beginning that it would be unpopular. They knew what they were doing, was wrong. 

An internal memo from 2024 stated: 

“Project Panama is our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world.”

“We don’t want it to be known that we are working on this.”

Why used books? 

Companies like Anthropic and Meta found it impractical to gain permission from authors and publishers to use their work. 

So instead, they stole their work to train their product through mass purchases of used books and through pirating them from the internet. 

The authors of these works, didn’t receive a dime for their efforts. These companies stole the hard won literary talent of others to train machines to replace the victims of their theft.

Anthropic cofounder Ben Mann personally downloaded countless books for this purpose from LibGen, a book pirating website. 

When a new book piracy website debuted in 2022, Mann sent an email sharing the link with his employees stating: “just in time!!!”

Meta employees were wary about the piracy of books, with one engineer writing, “Torrenting from a corporate laptop doesn’t feel right.”

Anthropic purchased millions of books, in batches of tens of thousands from  Better World Books and U.K.-based World of Books. 

They then used a “hydraulic powered cutting machine” to slice off the spines of these books before scanning them. Finally, the remains of these books were picked up for recycling. 

Feel free to use AI, it’s a free country. 

But remember that, if you use Claude, that Anthropic has committed a great wrong, and they knew that they were doing it from the beginning. 

Below is an image, from a court case, of a warehouse full of used books, that instead of being held and read by you and your children, have been destroyed forever. 

AI is inevitable, but spend your money on the companies who do good, and do not knowingly commit evils. 

May the most moral company win. 


Source: @BBHerodotus

Sunday, August 23, 2026

It’s about souls. Not clicks.

Please stop turning Catholics over to the inquisition.

Please let Catholics attend the TLM in peace. The news cycle will forgive you if you forgo a scoop about who goes to Mass where.

If you’re living behind a keyboard and amassing clicks and views online, that’s fine for you, but please remember souls are in the balance. Catholic families just want to attend Sunday Mass in peace without publicity.

If you’re a Catholic, please put souls first. There will be a judgment. Be on the right side of it.


Greece closing mosques and deporting Muslims who build them illegally

Greece announced that it will close 60 mosques throughout the country and deport those who continue to illegally build Islamic religious spaces.

Greece is fighting against the Islamization of Europe.

Greece is right.

@realMalouf




EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW Bishop Rob Mutsaerts says ‘The missing words in the Synod are repentance and conversion’

 

Niwa Limbu.                                     Aug. 22, 2026



Photo: Infovaticana


Bishop Rob Mutsaerts has served as the Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of ’s-Hertogenbosch since 2010. His ministry has been typified by a confidence in proclaiming the truth, notably through his criticism of the 2019 Amazon Synod and his concerns over the lack of evangelical wisdom behind Traditionis Custodes.

He has also been a forceful voice against the tides of Dutch secularism in a country that has experienced some of the more pernicious elements of the trend. In the Netherlands, the lives of newborns and children under 12 can be deliberately ended without an affirmative request from the child under strictly defined circumstances, while euthanasia can be administered to those aged 12 and over in cases of psychiatric suffering. Almost 60 per cent of the country reports no religious affiliation, while Islam is the fastest-growing major religion, with more than twice as many 15–17-year-olds identifying as Muslim (14.2 per cent) as Catholic (6.9 per cent). Against this backdrop, His Grace has worked tirelessly, writing numerous spiritual works and encouraging conversions, work that is bearing fruit in a country that saw a 40 per cent increase in adult baptisms in 2024.

In this exclusive interview, Bishop Mutsaerts shares with AdVaticanum his reflections on a recent open letter he wrote to Pope Leo XIV, his views on the synodal process and how he sees the Church in the Netherlands.

AV: In your recent open letter to Pope Leo XIV, you write that judging the synodal process by its own internal metrics (listening, participation, documents) can produce a positive narrative, but that the real tests are stronger faith, clearer proclamation of Christ, deeper Catholic identity, more conversions, higher Sunday Mass attendance, etc. Could you walk us through how you arrived at that list of criteria?

+RM: The final canon of the Code of Canon Law ends with the famous principle that “the salvation of souls … must always be the supreme law in the Church” (salus animarum … suprema semper lex esse debet, can. 1752). If one evaluates the synodal process, the decisive question is not whether consultations were extensive, people felt heard, committees functioned well, or documents were produced. The question is: has all this made it more likely that men and women will believe in Jesus Christ, repent, receive the sacraments, persevere in grace, and attain eternal life? On that criterion, there are serious grounds for criticism.

AV: You insist that synodality cannot be an end in itself. What do you mean by that, and how should we understand the relationship between the means (consultation, participation, structures) and the true end of the Church’s mission?

+RM: “Walking together” is valuable only if the Church knows where she is walking. The destination is not increased participation but Christ; not ecclesiastical dialogue but holiness; not inclusion as an abstract principle but incorporation into Christ and, ultimately, eternal salvation.

Consultation, participation, pastoral structures and synodal methods all have their place. Once the means start occupying more attention than the end, something has become inverted.

Interestingly, the synodal documents themselves repeatedly acknowledge that evangelisation is the mission of the Church. The European continental document states that the Church’s task is to “proclaim the Gospel” and invite people into communion, and calls for renewed missionary activity in Europe. The disagreement, therefore, is less about the official intention than about emphasis, method and measurable fruit.

AV: In the letter, you state: “Christus heeft geen discussiegroep opgericht. Hij riep apostelen. Hij gaf hun gezag” (“Christ did not found a discussion group. He called apostles. He gave them authority”), and you add that the faith does not arise from the Church first taking an inventory of what people believe and then distilling a common conviction from those experiences. How do you see this principle applying to the ongoing implementation phase of the synodal process, which continues towards an Ecclesial Assembly in Rome in October 2028? Where, in your view, does authentic listening end and the teaching office of the bishops begin?

+RM: A physician listens carefully to the patient, but listening is not the cure. And the Church possesses something unusual among institutions: she has received a Revelation which she did not invent and cannot rewrite. Consequently, there must always come a moment when listening gives way to proclamation of the Gospel. The missing words in the Synod are repentance and conversion.

AV: Is there a necessary contradiction between synodality and tradition? What would a synodality truly ordered towards salus animarum look like in practice?

+RM: There is no necessary contradiction between synodality and tradition. Imagine a synodal Church asking every parish: Why are your baptised teenagers disappearing? Why have confessions collapsed? Where are young families attending Mass? Why? Where are young adults requesting baptism? What brought them to Christ? That would be synodality ordered towards salus animarum. Listening would remain – but we would be listening partly because we desperately wanted to discover how to save souls. And suddenly the entire process would acquire focus.

AV: The Netherlands is widely regarded as one of the most secularised and liberal societies in the Western world. What do you identify as the roots of this crisis in the Dutch Church?

+RM: The Dutch reality provides a sobering test. The situation of Catholicism in the Netherlands is extraordinarily difficult to present as a pastoral success. Dutch statistics report that there were 3.448 million registered Catholics in 2024. Yet the sacramental statistics are even more depressing. From a Catholic perspective, this points towards a catastrophic failure to transmit the faith from one generation to another.

And this is precisely where salus animarumbecomes uncomfortable. If millions remain nominally Catholic but only a tiny proportion regularly encounter the Eucharistic Christ; if baptised children disappear before Confirmation; if Catholic marriage becomes statistically exceptional; then it is insufficient to say that new consultative structures have been created.

More: https://x.com/realadvaticanum/status/2091232471354331205?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Saturday, August 22, 2026

“By their fruits you will know them.”

One of the clearest bad fruits of Medjugorje is Ivan Dragičević.

For nearly 45 years, he has claimed that the Mother of God appears to him every single day while his public identity, speaking appearances, and family pilgrimage business have grown around that claim.

Authentic Marian visionaries do not make themselves the center. They tremble, obey, suffer, retreat, and disappear behind the message.

Ivan became a traveling attraction whose appearances were promoted with the expectation that an “apparition” would occur while he was there.


He married the former Miss Massachusetts, has made a fortune off the apparitions, and now lives in a multi-million dollar home in Boston when he is not needed to put on shows and cater to manipulated pilgrims in Medjugorge.

In 2013, Rome intervened.

The CDF warned every U.S. diocese that Ivan was touring American parishes and was expected to receive “apparitions” during his visits. Clergy and faithful were not permitted to attend events where the visions’ credibility was taken for granted.

Think about how spiritually grotesque that is:

The Queen of Heaven reduced to a scheduled feature on a parish-event itinerary as though Ivan could carry a daily apparition from venue to venue while the Church itself still refused to authenticate it.

And the concerns about money are not internet gossip.

Published accounts of the Ruini Commission’s confidential report say it was especially severe toward Ivan, recording grave and substantiated reservations about his credibility and criticizing the visionaries’ ambiguous relationship with money. 


The commercial overlap remains visible.

Pilgrimage companies advertise “Medjugorje with Ivan,” including seven nights in the Dragičević family home, meals, a private chapel, spiritual activities, and opportunities connected with Ivan’s presence and testimony.

Does that prove criminal fraud? No, and I will not claim what I cannot prove.

But it reveals something spiritually ugly: the alleged daily access to Our Lady and the family’s commercial pilgrimage enterprise are not cleanly separated.

The visionary is part of the product.

Medjugorje defenders answer: “But look at the conversions!”

God can draw souls even from confusion. The Rosary works. Confession works. The Eucharist is Jesus Christ.

None of that authenticates Ivan or transforms celebrity, commerce, scheduled visions, and grave credibility concerns into good fruit.


Ivan is not the entire case against Medjugorje. He is one bad fruit among many: conflict with lawful bishops, dubious messages, celebrity visionaries, financial entanglements, and nearly half a century of claims the Church has never declared supernatural. 

I do not believe Our Lady is behind it.

And I love her too much to call this hers.


Source: @BreeSolstad

N.B. Agreed: conversions prove God was at work. They don’t prove the alleged apparitions or the location of conversions was necessary to the working of grace or are the source of it. Bernadette and other approved visionaries withdrew from the world and did not enrich themselves as seers of the apparitions. Bernadette said, “The waters are not for me” after Our Lady told her, “I cannot promise you happiness in this life, only in the next.”

Friday, August 21, 2026

The Feast of the Holy Face

In 1958, a few short months before his death, Ven Pope Pius XII approved the Feast of the Holy Face, enshrining it on the Tuesday before Ash Wednesday. 

We can consider the Feast of the Holy Face, as one of the final gifts left to the Church by that most holy pontiff.

And considering his great concern about the future of the Church at the end of his life, we should most urgently consider what this meant to him.

So if you are a Pacelli fan, learn about the Holy Face.



Source: auxiliumvolto.com


Thank you for visiting.

Followers

Kamsahamnida, Dziekuje, Terima kasih, Doh je, Grazie, Tesekur, Gracias, Dank u, Shukran

free counters