Sunday, October 4, 2026

Restoration of the Sscred? “ Cardinal Gambetti leaves St Peter’s for Chieti-Vasto”


NIWA LIMBU

                               OCT. 3, 2026

Cardinal Gambetti leaves St Peter’s for Chieti-Vasto












Pope Leo XIV has appointed Cardinal Mauro Gambetti Archbishop of Chieti-Vasto. AdVaticanum understands a northern Italian prelate is expected to succeed him at St Peter’s Basilica


The Vatican has confirmed the departure of Cardinal Mauro Gambetti from his posts overseeing St Peter’s Basilica, with Pope Leo XIV appointing him Metropolitan Archbishop of Chieti-Vasto in Italy.

The appointment, published by the Holy See on 3 October, transfers Cardinal Gambetti from the offices of Vicar General of His Holiness for Vatican City, Archpriest of the Papal Basilica of St Peter in the Vatican and President of the Fabric of St Peter. His successor as Archpriest of St Peter’s has not been announced.

Pope Leo accepted the resignation of Archbishop Bruno Forte from the pastoral care of the Metropolitan Archdiocese of Chieti-Vasto and appointed Cardinal Gambetti, OFM Conv., to succeed him.

Archbishop Forte had announced on 2 October that he would convene an extraordinary Assembly of the People of God at 11.30am on 3 October in the Cathedral of San Giustino in Chieti to communicate “news of great importance for the entire life of the Archdiocese”.

“All of you are invited to attend,” Archbishop Forte wrote to the faithful, asking them to accompany the moment “with prayer” and invoking the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary, St Michael, St Justin and all the saints for the archdiocese, the Church and the world.

Gambetti had already told the canons of the Vatican Chapter on Friday that the Holy See would announce his appointment as archbishop the following day. According to Francesco Capozza, Vatican correspondent for Il Tempo, the cardinal convened the meeting himself and confirmed that he was being appointed to a diocese, but declined to identify it “out of respect for protocol and the Holy Father”.

Cardinal Gambetti appeared at the meeting with a noticeable bandage on his head following a recent minor procedure to remove a mole. He did not say who would succeed him at St Peter’s. The expected move to Chieti-Vasto had previously been reported by Dagospia.

The decision comes after a period in which Gambetti’s administration of St Peter’s attracted criticism over security incidents, relations with the basilica’s canons and the centralisation of administrative authority.

AdVaticanum reported exclusively in July that the cardinal was expected to leave, identifying three factors behind a loss of confidence: his handling of St Peter’s Basilica, tensions with the canons of St Peter’s and the initial confidence he placed in Fr Enzo Fortunato.

Cardinal Gambetti, appointed in 2021, had responsibility for the basilica during three incidents in which the Altar of the Confession, beneath Bernini’s baldacchino and over the tomb of St Peter, was desecrated, each followed by a penitential rite of reparation.

On 1 June 2023, a Polish man “stripped naked except for socks and trainers, climbed onto the altar and displayed the words ‘Save children of Ukraine’ written across his back”.

Gambetti led a penitential rite two days later and placed the incident “within the context of the ‘structure of sin’ in the world”.

On 7 February 2025, another man climbed onto the Altar of the Confession, threw six candelabra to the ground, damaging them, and began removing the altar cloth.

On 10 October 2025, a further man climbed onto the altar before hundreds of tourists, undressed and either urinated on it or attempted to do so. Gambetti presided over a rite of reparation on 13 October.

His tenure also involved “a programme of centralising reform”. Associates from his period as Custos of the Sacred Convent of Assisi were brought into senior positions. Under norms introduced during Pope Francis’s pontificate, including transitional rules in 2021 and definitive statutes established by chirograph on 29 June 2024, the Treasury Museum, the sale of religious articles and former Chapter employees were transferred to the Fabric of St Peter.

The canons and coadjutors were placed on a single stipend paid by the Fabric, aligned with level VIII of the Roman Curia scale and unable to be combined with other Vatican remuneration.

Sources close to the canons told AdVaticanum that they believed the Chapter’s autonomy had been significantly reduced as Cardinal Gambetti centralised authority, diminished the canons’ influence and funding and prioritised what one source described as “liberal efficiency”.

One dispute centred on the replacement of long-standing metal chairs with transparent plastic seating. The canons argued that the original chairs formed part of the basilica’s “dignity and historic character”. Gambetti maintained that the metal chairs were damaging the marble floor and that the Fabric had been “spending more than $1 million annually replacing worn marble slabs”. The replacement seating cost “around $200,000”.

The dispute became a symbol of wider disagreements over the administration of St Peter’s and what the canons regarded as the loss of an “established aesthetic and liturgical tradition”.

One source told AdVaticanum at the time: “Some of the reality has been that the canons have really exaggerated things about Cardinal Gambetti. All of that mess, combined with the resentment of the canons, hasn’t done Gambetti any favours.”

Another source said: “Cardinal Gambetti is more of an engineer than a politician, and he’s not good at managing the internal politics. Whereas all these canons are politicians.”

The AdVaticanum report also said multiple sources claimed Pope Francis “did not like the bureaucracy of the Chapter of Canons” and that his desire to sideline it had served a deliberate purpose.

A further source of controversy was Gambetti’s early confidence in Franciscan Fr Enzo Fortunato, who had worked with him at Assisi. Fortunato became head of communications for the basilica and subsequently Special Project Manager.

“Cardinal Gambetti’s confidence in Fr Fortunato led to his appointment to a prominent role at St Peter’s,” the report said. “Many within St Peter’s questioned Fr Fortunato’s approach and his handling of major initiatives, including the organisation of World Children’s Day.”

Sources alleged that “a substantial amount of money was wasted due to Fr Fortunato’s running of World Children’s Day”. They said funds were routed through external Italian associations, including Be Human, rather than Vatican accounts.

A late-2025 balance cited in the report showed approximately €1.2 million in income, €580,000 in expenditure and roughly €650,000 remaining in liquid assets, with about €260,000 subsequently transferred into Vatican-managed accounts after bills had been paid.

Sources cited by AdVaticanum further alleged that, as confidence in Gambetti declined, “Fr Fortunato sought to distance himself from the cardinal and, according to those sources, manoeuvred against him internally”. They also alleged that Fortunato filmed inside Vatican City despite restrictions, including livestreaming Pope Francis during his illness, and was “frequently rude to employees”.

Because several canons closely associated Fortunato with Gambetti, the report said, the association “further damag[ed] the cardinal’s standing”. Fortunato was also expected to leave.

Gambetti will now take charge of the Archdiocese of Chieti-Vasto, while the Vatican has yet to announce who will assume responsibility for St Peter’s Basilica.

More: https://x.com/realadvaticanum/status/2106400849089921320?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Saturday, October 3, 2026

Dicastery for Divine Worship Undersecretary warns against turning liturgy into ‘permanent laboratory’ Thomas Edwards

Thomas Edwards.               Sep. 9, 2026



The Undersecretary of the Dicastery for Divine Worship has warned 49 newly appointed bishops against unnecessary liturgical innovation, syncretism and turning the liturgy into a “permanent laboratory”


The Undersecretary of the Dicastery for Divine Worship has warned 49 newly appointed bishops against turning liturgical inculturation into either a rejection of tradition or a constant search for novelty.

Bishop Aurelio García Macías, Undersecretary of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, told the bishops last week that they must avoid both extremes as they seek to bring the liturgy into the cultures of the peoples they serve.

“We must not be afraid of cultures, neither must we idealize them,” Bishop García said. “We must not be afraid of diversity, neither must we sacrifice communion. We must not stifle the authentic creativity of the Spirit, neither must we confuse it with arbitrariness. We must not turn the liturgy into a museum of immutable forms, neither must we turn it into a permanent laboratory.”

The Spanish prelate was speaking during the formation course for new bishops organised by the Dicastery for Evangelization’s Section for First Evangelization and New Particular Churches. This year’s course is dedicated to the theme “Servants of Communion in the Church” and brought together 49 newly appointed bishops at the Pontifical Missionary College St Peter the Apostle.

Bishop García, Titular Bishop of Rotdon, gave a presentation entitled “The Liturgy in the Episcopal Ministry. Continuity and Newness in the Liturgy in the Context of First Evangelization”, addressing the bishops on the place of worship within their episcopal ministry.

He recalled the opening words of the Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy, Sacrosanctum Concilium, which says that the Council sought “to impart an ever increasing vigor to the Christian life of the faithful” and “to adapt more suitably to the needs of our own times those institutions which are subject to change”.

He also recalled the Council’s teaching that “the liturgy is the summit toward which the activity of the Church is directed; at the same time it is the font from which all her power flows”.

“The liturgy does not belong to the priest who celebrates it, to the group that prepares it, or to the particular community that takes part in it,” Bishop García said. “The liturgy belongs to Christ and to the Church.”

The question of inculturation formed the centre of his presentation, with Bishop García noting that for many of the Churches entrusted to the new bishops it is “not a theoretical problem, but a daily pastoral concern”. The Bishop cautioned against reducing inculturation to the visible addition of cultural practices to Catholic worship. It “does not simply mean introducing elements of local culture into the liturgy”, he said. It is not sufficient merely to “add a traditional song, introduce a dance, use a local musical instrument or translate a text”.

“No culture is the Gospel,” Bishop García said.

“Every culture needs to be evangelized…Every culture contains the semina Verbi, but every culture also bears the wounds of sin,” the Prelate said.

The Gospel therefore “welcomes and purifies, embraces and transforms, confirms and corrects, elevates and, when necessary, calls for a break”.

Bishop García warned the new bishops particularly against three dangers: unnecessary innovation, syncretism and folklore. On innovation, he referred to Sacrosanctum Concilium, which states that no changes should be introduced “unless a genuine and proven benefit to the Church requires it”.

Syncretism, meanwhile, was identified as a “particularly sensitive issue in areas where traditional religions remain culturally very much alive”. The warning is especially relevant to missionary territories where Christian worship exists alongside longstanding religious traditions.

The Bishop also cautioned against folklore, insisting that “the liturgy is not a cultural performance”. A cultural practice should enter the liturgy not because it is visually striking or distinctive, but because “it can serve the mystery being celebrated”.

Bishop García also referred to the 1994 instruction Varietates legitimae, which states that “the first significant measure of inculturation is the translation of liturgical books into the language of the people”. At the same time, he stressed that every translation “must be faithful to the original text”. Such developments, Bishop García told the bishops, cannot be rushed. Inculturation “cannot be improvised; it cannot be decided on the basis of a single successful celebration, nor can it depend on the enthusiasm of a bishop/priest or a group”.

More: https://x.com/realadvaticanum/status/2097608144755335586?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Friday, October 2, 2026

Bishop Schneider disputes Pope Leo’s claim of less active participation at Latin Mass

 Bishop Athanasius Schneider noted that Pope Leo's remarks did not grasp the 'true reality' of how most Novus Ordo Masses are celebrated and said the Council Fathers did not intend for Mass to be totally in the vernacular.

Featured Image
Bishop Athanasius SchneiderLifeSiteNews


Minnesota priest leaves diocese for SSPX, bishop begins canonical process

Archbishop Bernard Hebda said he has opened a canonical process against Father Philip Conklin to 'clarify the situation and his status.'

Featured Image
Sergio Foto/Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) — Father Philip Conklin, formerly a priest of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, has left the diocese to join the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Archbishop Bernard Hebda announced this week.

Archbishop Hebda explained that the priest had decided to affiliate with the SSPX following a sabbatical to discern his vocation in March, per an article in the Catholic Spirit, the official newspaper of the archdiocese.

The announcement came in a letter to the parishioners of St. Michael and St. Mary in Stillwater, where Conklin had served as a priest since his ordination in 2024 until earlier this year.

The archbishop further stressed that, because of Conklin’s affiliation with the Society and his refusal to end it, he decided to open a canonical process to “clarify the situation and his status.”

“At the same time, I have also informed Father Conklin that he is not to exercise any public priestly ministry,” Hebda wrote.

As of this writing, Conklin has not released a public statement on the matter.

The priest’s decision to affiliate with the SSPX is notable since the order has faced significant obstacles since its July consecration of four new bishops without a papal mandate and subsequent Vatican excommunication. Indeed, the order has been barred from using several prominent Catholic churches to celebrate Mass or pray as a group.

In August, Bishop Jean-Marc Micas of Tarbes and Lourdes banned the SSPX from celebrating Masses, sacraments, and public prayers within the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes.

More: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/minnesota-priest-leaves-diocese-for-sspx-bishop-begins-canonical-process/?utm_source=SOCIAL&fbclid=IwdGRjcAUsmUxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBwZG9mBWZkaWQWUPjc15vmE-EVxx2ZmaBLgrcXBbsBKnNydGMGYXBwX2lkCjY2Mjg1NjgzNzkAAR6UCpzVq-pl_DSMnrnEJaOalrP9-vdz-nmIS9iY8SAvBeWZJAOXtNgOkqMMxg_aem_-ZdfoasYSjvMFWBaKZLgRA

Thursday, October 1, 2026

AI Child Porn and the Libertarian Lie








JONATHON VAN MAREN

On August 25, Judge John Z. Lee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that the First Amendment protects the right of Americans to possess AI-generated child pornography. In a concurring opinion, Lee noted that “given the significant advances in computer-generated image technology, particularly in the field of artificial intelligence, we would benefit from additional guidance from the Supreme Court regarding the intersection between the First Amendment and virtual CSAM [child sexual abuse material] if an appropriate case should arise.”

The case centers around Wisconsinite Steven Anderegg, who was charged by the Justice Department in 2024 “with producing, distributing, and possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct and transferring such material to a minor under the age of sixteen.” Anderegg had created thousands of images using Stable Diffusion, a “generative artificial intelligence software”; many images were “hyper-realistic . . . of prepubescent children engaging in sexually explicit acts.” Child pornography, but without real children.

In 2025, a Western District of Wisconsin judge dismissed Anderegg’s possession charge. (He still faces charges for producing and distributing the images.) Federal prosecutors appealed the dismissal, but Lee upheld the lower court ruling, albeit with explicit reluctance, citing the Supreme Court rulings Stanley v. Georgia(1969)—which states that “individuals have a First Amendment right to possess obscenity in the privacy of their home”—and Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002). 

“We now live in an age where GenAI models can render images depicting the abuse of virtual children that are virtually indistinguishable from those depicting the abuse of actual children,” he wrote. “This case illuminates how this evolving technology complicates the lines drawn by the Supreme Court. . . . Given the relentless advancement in artificial intelligence models, we have some concerns about the lines these cases draw, but we are not free to redraw them ourselves.”

Contrary to the implication of some headlines, Lee’s ruling was narrow, stating that the Justice Department cannot use possession statute 18 U.S.C. § 1466A(b)(1) against the in-home possession of obscene images that do not depict a real child. The ruling does not deny that the images are obscene, nor does it protect the creation or distribution of AI-generated child porn. But it does highlight the emerging front in the porn wars, adding child porn to the growing concern about deepfakes and “nudify apps.” As one dystopian CBS headline put it: “AI ‘nudify’ apps that can digitally undress any photo pose back-to-school risk.”

Decades of libertarian propaganda about porn have left us ill-prepared to deal with this moment. In some quarters, the specter of AI-generated CSAM has prompted the same arguments we have heard applied to pornography more generally: that porn use serves the social function of “safety valve” or “outlet” for sexually violent impulses and thus decreases the incidence of actual sexual violence. In a 2023 essay for Wired, Danielle Bernstein argued that AI-generated CSAM “could actually benefit society in the long run by providing a less harmful alternative to the already-massive market for images of child sexual abuse.”

More: https://firstthings.com/ai-child-porn-and-the-libertarian-lie/


Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Pope Leo XIV appoints Ferenc Palánki as archbishop, a defender of the family and member of the episcopate that set limits on Fiducia supplicans

 

Pope Leo XIV appoints Ferenc Palánki as archbishop, a defender of the family and member of the episcopate that set limits on Fiducia supplicans

Pope Leo XIV has appointed Monsignor Ferenc Palánki as the new metropolitan archbishop of Kalocsa-Kecskemét, in Hungary. The former bishop of Debrecen-Nyíregyháza, aged 62, has publicly defended marriage between a man and a woman, the family, and the transmission of life, and was part of the Hungarian episcopate that, following the publication of Fiducia supplicans, called for avoiding joint blessings of same-sex couples and couples in irregular situations.

The Holy See announced the appointment on Thursday, September 3, while also communicating that Leo XIV had accepted the resignation submitted by Monsignor Balázs Bábel from the pastoral governance of the archdiocese.

Palánki thus arrives at one of the metropolitan sees of the Church in Hungary after nearly eleven years leading Debrecen-Nyíregyháza, a diocese to which he was appointed by Francis on September 21, 2015. His episcopal career shows a special focus on the family and marriage, along with a long-standing dedication to priestly formation and Canon Law.

Marriage and the transmission of life

Palánki has defended on various occasions a conception of marriage founded on the union between a man and a woman and oriented toward the family and the transmission of life.

During the Week of Marriage held in 2022 in Nyíregyháza, in eastern Hungary, he maintained that marriage is of fundamental importance for “the future of humanity” and referred directly to Genesis: “A man leaves his father and mother, joins with his wife, and the two become one.”

The prelate then stated that marital love “is not simply a feeling,” but involves a decision and a commitment. He also explicitly linked marriage to the transmission of life and the continuity of generations.

This vision also appears in his interventions on the Holy Family. In December 2023, Palánki noted that the mission of spouses consists in helping each other to reach God and to love the children entrusted to them.

In an extensive interview given in 2021 to the media of his diocese, he also recalled the Catholic education he received during his childhood in Csesztve, a small town in northern Hungary. Palánki highlighted that he grew up in an environment where there were “clear and unequivocal” concepts about what marriage meant, what the place of children was, and what it meant to sacrifice oneself for others.

The Hungarian episcopate set limits on Fiducia supplicans

The new archbishop was also a member of the Hungarian Episcopal Conference when it responded in December 2023 to Fiducia supplicans, the declaration of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith that opened the possibility of imparting non-liturgical pastoral blessings to couples in irregular situations and of the same sex.

The response of the Hungarian bishops came on December 27, just nine days after the publication of the Vatican declaration. The Episcopal Conference began by recalling that Fiducia supplicans “does not change the faith and perennial teaching of the Catholic Church on marriage and sexual morality.”

The bishops noted that priests could individually bless any person who requested a blessing, regardless of their gender identity or sexual orientation.

However, they set a limit on the application of the document in Hungary: they called for “always avoiding the joint blessing” of couples living together without having contracted a valid marriage before the Church, of those in a marriage the Church considered invalid, and of same-sex couples.

In this way, the Hungarian episcopate ruled out that the possibility contemplated by Fiducia supplicanswould translate in the country into blessings imparted jointly to these couples.

More: https://x.com/infovaticana/status/2095468490907885841?s=46&t=IydJ-X8H6c0NM044nYKQ0w

Father Martin at NYC LGBT “Mass”: Young Catholics Pray and Protest Sacrilege


Posted by “Cool Catholics” via Facebook:

Young Catholics with TFP Student Action gathered outside the Church of St. Ignatius Loyola in New York City to pray the Rosary and protest what they described as a sacrilegious and pro-LGBT Mass involving Jesuit Father James Martin.

The demonstrators said their presence was intended to defend Catholic teaching on marriage, sexuality and human dignity. TFP has repeatedly organized Rosary rallies in response to Father Martin’s public ministry and LGBT-related events.

The Church of St. Ignatius Loyola has an “LGBT Catholics & Friends” parish ministry, which describes itself as a ministry for LGBT parishioners, family members and friends.

Whatever disagreements Catholics may have over how pastoral ministry should be conducted, the Church cannot change the truths entrusted to her. Catholic charity must never mean abandoning Catholic truth—and defending Catholic truth must never mean abandoning charity.

The Rosary remains one of the most powerful ways Catholics can respond: pray, remain faithful, and ask God for conversion and holiness.

Our Lady, Seat of Wisdom, pray for us.

#CatholicNews #CatholicChurch #CatholicFaith #TFPStudentAction #JamesMartin


Young Catholics Pray and Protest Heresy and Sacrilege Outside NY Church  


Thank you for visiting.

Followers

Kamsahamnida, Dziekuje, Terima kasih, Doh je, Grazie, Tesekur, Gracias, Dank u, Shukran

free counters